Belton v. Indigo Dye Group Corp.
Filing
18
AMENDED STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 01/07/2022 MODIFYING Scheduling Order as follows: Discovery due by 2/7/2022; Dispositive Motions filed by 3/21/2022; Dispositive Motion Hearing set for 05/03/2022 at 1:30 PM; J oint Mid-Litigation Statement Filing due 14 days prior to the close of discovery; Final Pretrial Conference set for 6/17/2022 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 6 (JAM) before District Judge John A. Mendez; Jury Trial set for 8/1/2022 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 6 (JAM) before District Judge John A. Mendez. (Rodriguez, E)
1
2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
3
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
4
LUCKIESIA BELTON,
5
Plaintiff,
6
v.
7
Case No.
2:20-cv-02439-JAM-DB
AMENDED STIPULATION AND JOINT
REQUEST TO MODIFY SCHEDULING
ORDER AND PROPOSED ORDER1
INDIGO DYE GROUP CORP.,
8
Defendant.
9
10
Plaintiff Luckiesia Belton and Defendant Indigo Dye Group Corp., by and through their
11
respective Counsel, hereby stipulate, agree, and jointly respectfully move the Court an extension to
12
the deadlines for completion of discovery and for the filing of dispositive motions, and in support state
13
as follows.
14
On April 8, 2021, the Court entered its Pretrial Scheduling Order setting a discovery
15
completion date of January 7, 2021 and a dispositive motions deadline of February 18, 2022. Dkt. 10.
16
The Parties have been working diligently to meet these deadlines. However, due to COVID related
17
illness, the Parties have had to reschedule depositions in this matter multiple times and have not not
18
been able to complete Defendant’s Fed. R. Civ. P. 30(b)(6) deposition or Plaintiff’s deposition.
19
The Parties respectfully jointly request that the Court extend the discovery completion and
20
dispositive motions deadlines as described below to allow completing of depositions in this matter and
21
allow the Parties to properly support their dispositive motions. This is the Parties first request for an
22
extension, which is made in good faith and not for the purpose of delay.
NOW, THEREFORE, based on the foregoing, the Parties stipulate and agree and jointly
23
24
request that the Court find there is good cause to modify the Scheduling Order as follows:
25
Discovery Cutoff Date:
2/7/2022;
26
Dispositive Motion Filing Deadline:
3/21/2022;
27
28
1
Amended pursuant to the Court’s direction to reflect schedule the Court has informed the Parties
it can accommodate.
1
Dispositive Motion Hearing:
5/3/2022 at 1:30 PM;
2
Joint Mid-Litigation Statement Filing Deadline:
Fourteen (14) days prior to the close of discovery;
3
4
Final Pretrial Conference:
6/17/2022 at 10:00 AM; and
5
Jury/Bench Trial
8/1/2022 at 9:00 AM.
6
7
8
Dated: January 7, 2022
9
Respectfully submitted,
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
By: /s/ Donald Walker (with express permission)
Attorney for Defendant
Indigo Dye group Corp.
By: /s/ Ignacio J. Hiraldo
IJH LAW
Ignacio J. Hiraldo
Pro Hac Vice
Florida Bar No. 56031
1200 Brickell Ave Suite 1950
Miami, FL 33131
Email: ijhiraldo@ijhlaw.com
Telephone: 786.469.4496
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
ORDER
1
2
Having read and considered the Amended Stipulation and Joint Request to Modify
3
Scheduling Order dated January 7, 2021 (“Stipulation”), and good cause appearing, the Court hereby
4
GRANTS the Parties’ joint request and ORDERS that the Pretrial Scheduling Order, Dkt. 10, be
5
modified as follows:
6
Discovery Cutoff Date:
2/7/2022;
7
Dispositive Motion Filing Deadline:
3/21/2022;
8
Dispositive Motion Hearing:
5/3/2022 at 1:30 PM;
9
Joint Mid-Litigation Statement Filing Deadline:
Fourteen (14) days prior to the close of discovery;
10
11
Final Pretrial Conference:
6/17/2022 at 10:00 AM; and
12
Jury/Bench Trial
8/1/2022 at 9:00 AM.
13
14
IT IS SO ORDERED.
15
16
17
Dated: January 7, 2022
/s/ John A. Mendez
THE HONORABLE JOHN A. MENDEZ
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?