Johnson et al v. Soliant Health, Inc.
Filing
9
STIPULATION and ORDER for ARBITRATION signed by Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 2/17/21 ORDERING that plaintiff Phillip Johnson's claims shall be submitted to arbitration with the American Arbitration Association pursuant to its employment arbitration rules, and this matter is DISMISSED, without prejudice. CASE CLOSED(Kastilahn, A)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
PATRICK J. CAIN (SBN 105331)
THEODORE H. DOKKO (SBN 263830)
SMITH, GAMBRELL & RUSSELL, LLP
444 South Flower Street Suite 1700
Los Angeles, California 90071
Telephone: 213 358-7200
Facsimile: 213-358-7300
Email: pcain@sgrlaw.com
tdokko@sgrlaw.com
Attorneys for Defendants
SOLIANT HEALTH, LLC, and
SOLIANT PHYSICIAN STAFFING, LLC
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
SACRAMENTO
SMITH, GAMBRELL & RUSSELL, LLP
444 SOUTH FLOWER STREET, SUITE 1700
LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90071
TELEPHONE: 213 358-7200
11
12
PHILLIP JOHNSON, on behalf of
himself and others similarly situated,
13
14
15
16
17
Case No. 2:20-CV-02474-KJM-DB
(San Joaquin County Superior Court
Case No.: STK-CV-VOE-20200004388)
Plaintiff,
vs.
SOLIANT HEALTH, INC.; SOLIANT
PHYSICIAN STAFFING, LLC; and
DOES 1-20, inclusive,
STIPULATION AND ORDER
FOR ARBITRATION
Defendants.
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR ARBITRATION
SGR/24194316.1
1
2
STIPULATION
Plaintiff Phillip Johnson, on the one hand, and defendants Soliant Health,
3
Inc., and Soliant Physician Staffing, LLC, on the other hand, acting by and through
4
their counsel of record, stipulate and agree as follows:
5
6
7
8
9
1.
This matter may be submitted to binding arbitration with the American
Arbitration Association pursuant to its employment arbitration rules.
2.
The parties further stipulate and agree that this action may be dismissed
without prejudice.
3.
Commencing on the date this action was filed in the state court (i.e.,
SMITH, GAMBRELL & RUSSELL, LLP
May 28, 2020), and ending on the date 30 days after the Court enters the dismissal
11
444 SOUTH FLOWER STREET, SUITE 1700
LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90071
TELEPHONE: 213 358-7200
10
of this action (the “Tolling Period”), the Parties agree that the applicable statute of
12
limitations for the claims identified in this action are tolled. The Parties agree
13
during the Tolling Period to toll all statutes of limitations, statutes of
14
repose, equitable defenses of laches, and all other time-related bars and defenses
15
that may apply to Plaintiff’s claims identified in this action.
16
DATED: February 8, 2021
SMITH, GAMBRELL & RUSSELL, LLP
17
18
By:
19
20
21
22
DATED: February 8, 2021
/s/ Patrick J. Cain
Patrick J. Cain
Theodore H. Dokko
Attorneys for SOLIANT HEALTH, INC.,
AND SOLIANT PHYSICIAN STAFFING,
LLC
SHAKOURI LAW FIRM
23
24
25
By:
/s/ Ashkan Shakouri
Ashkan Shakouri
Attorneys for PHILLIP JOHNSON
26
27
28
2
STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR ARBITRATION
SGR/24194316.1
1
ORDER
2
Based on the foregoing stipulation, and good cause appearing therefor,
3
plaintiff Phillip Johnson’s claims shall be submitted to arbitration with the
4
American Arbitration Association pursuant to its employment arbitration rules, and
5
the matter is hereby dismissed, without prejudice. Further, commencing on the date
6
this action was filed in the state court (i.e., May 28, 2020), and ending on the date
7
30 days after entry of this order (the “Tolling Period”), the applicable statute of
8
limitations for the claims identified in this action are tolled, including statutes of
9
repose, equitable defenses of laches, and all other time-related bars and defenses
10
SMITH, GAMBRELL & RUSSELL, LLP
444 SOUTH FLOWER STREET, SUITE 1700
LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90071
TELEPHONE: 213 358-7200
11
that may apply to Plaintiff’s claims identified in this action.
At Sacramento, California, this 17th day of February 2021.
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR ARBITRATION
SGR/24194316.1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?