(PC) Priest v. Bentley et al

Filing 98

ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 2/2/2024 ADOPTING 83 The Findings and Recommendations in full; GRANTING 75 Supplemental Motion for Summary Judgment. This action is DISMISSED; and The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case. CASE CLOSED. (Mena-Sanchez, L)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DAVID PRIEST, 12 No. 2:21-cv-0058-TLN-KJN Plaintiff, 13 v. 14 BENTLEY, et al., 15 ORDER Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights action seeking relief 17 18 under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 19 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On March 9, 2023, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which 20 21 were served on all parties, and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the 22 findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff filed objections to 23 the findings and recommendations. In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this 24 25 Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the 26 Court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper 27 analysis. 28 ///// 1 1 2 3 4 5 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The findings and recommendations filed March 9, 2023 (ECF No. XX) are ADOPTED IN FULL; 2. Defendants’ Supplemental Motion for Summary Judgement (ECF No. 75) is GRANTED; 6 3. This action is DISMISSED; and 7 4. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case. 8 Date: February 2, 2024 9 10 11 12 Troy L. Nunley United States District Judge 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?