(PC) Priest v. Bentley et al
Filing
98
ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 2/2/2024 ADOPTING 83 The Findings and Recommendations in full; GRANTING 75 Supplemental Motion for Summary Judgment. This action is DISMISSED; and The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case. CASE CLOSED. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
DAVID PRIEST,
12
No. 2:21-cv-0058-TLN-KJN
Plaintiff,
13
v.
14
BENTLEY, et al.,
15
ORDER
Defendants.
16
Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights action seeking relief
17
18
under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to
19
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
On March 9, 2023, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which
20
21
were served on all parties, and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the
22
findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff filed objections to
23
the findings and recommendations.
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this
24
25
Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the
26
Court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper
27
analysis.
28
/////
1
1
2
3
4
5
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. The findings and recommendations filed March 9, 2023 (ECF No. XX) are
ADOPTED IN FULL;
2. Defendants’ Supplemental Motion for Summary Judgement (ECF No. 75) is
GRANTED;
6
3. This action is DISMISSED; and
7
4. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case.
8
Date: February 2, 2024
9
10
11
12
Troy L. Nunley
United States District Judge
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?