(PC) Woolery v. Shasta County Jail et al

Filing 37

ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 9/15/2022 ADOPTING in FULL 35 Findings and Recommendations, and this action is DISMISSED without prejudice. CASE CLOSED(Reader, L)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

JACOB DAVID WOOLERY,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14

No. 2:21-cv-00166-TLN-DB

v.

ORDER

SHASTA COUNTY JAIL, et al.,

15

Defendants.

16
Plaintiff, a former county prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a civil rights action

17
18

pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff claims defendants failed to properly consider his

19

grievances, refused to give him a parole form, and failed to provide adequate dental treatment.

20

The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B)

21

and Local Rule 302.
On July 6, 2022, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which

22
23

were served on all parties, and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the

24

findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. (ECF No. 35.) Neither party

25

has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.
The Court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be

26
27

supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis.

28

///
1

1

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

2

1.

3
4
5

The Findings and Recommendations filed July 6, 2022 (ECF No. 35) are

ADOPTED in full; and
2.

This action is DISMISSED without prejudice.

DATED: September 15, 2022

6
7
8
9

Troy L. Nunley
United States District Judge

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2