(PC) Folsom v. County of Shasta et al

Filing 8

ORDER signed by Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 9/7/21 ADOPTING 7 Findings and Recommendations. This action is dismissed without prejudice for plaintiff's failure to prosecute and failure to comply with court orders. The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter judgment for defendants and close this case. (Kaminski, H)

Case 2:21-cv-00186-KJM-DB Document 8 Filed 09/08/21 Page 1 of 2
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

LESTER STANLEY FOLSOM,

12

No. 2:21-cv-0186 KJM DB P

Plaintiff,

13

v.

ORDER

14

COUNTY OF SHASTA, et al.,

15

Defendants.

16
Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief

17
18

under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge as provided

19

by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

20

On June 28, 2021, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which were

21

served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings and

22

recommendations were to be filed within thirty days. Plaintiff has not filed objections to the

23

findings and recommendations.
The court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States,

24
25

602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed

26

de novo. See Robbins v. Carey, 481 F.3d 1143, 1147 (9th Cir. 2007) (“[D]eterminations of law

27

by the magistrate judge are reviewed de novo by both the district court and [the appellate] court

28

/////
1

Case 2:21-cv-00186-KJM-DB Document 8 Filed 09/08/21 Page 2 of 2
1

. . . .”). Having reviewed the file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be

2

supported by the record and by the proper analysis.

3

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

4

1. The findings and recommendations filed June 28, 2021 are adopted in full; and

5

2. This action is dismissed without prejudice for plaintiff’s failure to prosecute and failure

6
7
8

to comply with court orders. See E.D. Cal. Rs. 110 and 183(b); Fed. R. Civ. P. 41.
3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter judgment for defendants and close this case.
DATED: September 7, 2021.

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2