(PC) Folsom v. County of Shasta et al
Filing
8
ORDER signed by Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 9/7/21 ADOPTING 7 Findings and Recommendations. This action is dismissed without prejudice for plaintiff's failure to prosecute and failure to comply with court orders. The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter judgment for defendants and close this case. (Kaminski, H)
Case 2:21-cv-00186-KJM-DB Document 8 Filed 09/08/21 Page 1 of 2
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
LESTER STANLEY FOLSOM,
12
No. 2:21-cv-0186 KJM DB P
Plaintiff,
13
v.
ORDER
14
COUNTY OF SHASTA, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief
17
18
under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge as provided
19
by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
20
On June 28, 2021, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which were
21
served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings and
22
recommendations were to be filed within thirty days. Plaintiff has not filed objections to the
23
findings and recommendations.
The court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States,
24
25
602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed
26
de novo. See Robbins v. Carey, 481 F.3d 1143, 1147 (9th Cir. 2007) (“[D]eterminations of law
27
by the magistrate judge are reviewed de novo by both the district court and [the appellate] court
28
/////
1
Case 2:21-cv-00186-KJM-DB Document 8 Filed 09/08/21 Page 2 of 2
1
. . . .”). Having reviewed the file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be
2
supported by the record and by the proper analysis.
3
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
4
1. The findings and recommendations filed June 28, 2021 are adopted in full; and
5
2. This action is dismissed without prejudice for plaintiff’s failure to prosecute and failure
6
7
8
to comply with court orders. See E.D. Cal. Rs. 110 and 183(b); Fed. R. Civ. P. 41.
3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter judgment for defendants and close this case.
DATED: September 7, 2021.
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?