(PC) Coronado v. Saukhla

Filing 36

ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 05/06/2022 DENYING 35 Motion for Reconsideration. (Rodriguez, E)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 ISSAC M. CORONADO, 10 Plaintiff, 11 12 No. 2:21-cv-0215 WBS CKD P v. ORDER NARINDER SAUKHLA, 13 Defendant. 14 On April 25, 2022 (EFC No. 35 at 4),1 plaintiff filed a request for reconsideration of the 15 16 magistrate judge’s April 1, 2022 order striking plaintiff’s amended complaint because plaintiff 17 did not seek or obtain leave to amend, lifting the stay and ordering defendant to respond to the 18 remaining claim in the original complaint. Pursuant to E.D. Local Rule 303(f), a magistrate 19 judge’s orders shall be upheld unless “clearly erroneous or contrary to law.” Upon review of the 20 entire file, the court finds that it does not appear that the magistrate judge’s ruling is clearly 21 erroneous or contrary to law. Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration (ECF No. 22 23 35) is denied. 24 Dated: May 6, 2022 25 26 27 28 1 Documents submitted by prisoners in a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action such as this are deemed filed when the prisoner gives the document to a prison official for mailing. Douglas v. Noelle, 567 F.3d 1103, 1107 (9th Cir. 2009).

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?