(PC) Coronado v. Saukhla

Filing 36

ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 05/06/2022 DENYING 35 Motion for Reconsideration. (Rodriguez, E)

1
2
3
4
5
6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

8
9

ISSAC M. CORONADO,

10

Plaintiff,

11
12

No. 2:21-cv-0215 WBS CKD P

v.

ORDER

NARINDER SAUKHLA,

13

Defendant.

14
On April 25, 2022 (EFC No. 35 at 4),1 plaintiff filed a request for reconsideration of the

15
16

magistrate judge’s April 1, 2022 order striking plaintiff’s amended complaint because plaintiff

17

did not seek or obtain leave to amend, lifting the stay and ordering defendant to respond to the

18

remaining claim in the original complaint. Pursuant to E.D. Local Rule 303(f), a magistrate

19

judge’s orders shall be upheld unless “clearly erroneous or contrary to law.” Upon review of the

20

entire file, the court finds that it does not appear that the magistrate judge’s ruling is clearly

21

erroneous or contrary to law.
Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration (ECF No.

22
23

35) is denied.

24

Dated: May 6, 2022

25
26
27
28

1

Documents submitted by prisoners in a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action such as this are deemed filed
when the prisoner gives the document to a prison official for mailing. Douglas v. Noelle, 567
F.3d 1103, 1107 (9th Cir. 2009).