(HC) Thomas v. Villarreal
Filing
13
ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 7/14/2021 ADOPTING 8 Findings and Recommendations in full, DENYING 1 Petition for Writ of Mandamus. CASE CLOSED. (Coll, A)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
EDWARD N. THOMAS,
12
13
14
15
No. 2:21-cv-00216-TLN-CKD
Petitioner,
v.
ORDER
LYDIA A. VILLARREAL,
Respondent.
16
17
Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a petition for a writ of mandamus.
18
The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B)
19
and Local Rule 302.
20
On April 1, 2021, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which
21
were served on Petitioner and which contained notice to Petitioner that objections to the findings
22
and recommendations could be filed. Petitioner has not filed objections to the findings and
23
recommendations and the time for filing objections has expired.
24
The Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602
25
F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo.
26
See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). Having reviewed
27
the file, the Court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by
28
the magistrate judge’s analysis.
1
1
2
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
3
1. The findings and recommendations filed April 1, 2021, are ADOPTED IN FULL;
4
2. Petitioner’s petition for a writ of mandamus is DENIED; and
5
3. This case is closed.
6
DATED: July 14, 2021
7
8
9
10
Troy L. Nunley
United States District Judge
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?