(HC) Shah v. Alpine County Superior Court
Filing
10
ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 4/26/2021 ADOPTING the findings and recommendations filed 3/15/2021, ECF No. 8 , in full; and DISMISSING the Petitioner's application for writ of habeas corpus.(Becknal, R)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
FERNANDO SHAH,
12
Petitioner,
13
14
No. 2:21-cv-0232 JAM AC P
v.
ORDER
ALPINE COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT,
15
Respondent.
16
Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas
17
18
corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate
19
Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
On March 15, 2021, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein
20
21
which were served on petitioner and which contained notice to petitioner that any objections to
22
the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. ECF No. 8. Petitioner
23
has not filed objections to the findings and recommendations.
The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be
24
25
supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY
26
ORDERED that:
1. The findings and recommendations filed March 15, 2021, ECF No. 8, are adopted in
27
28
full;
1
1
2. Petitioner’s application for writ of habeas corpus is dismissed.
2
3
4
DATED: April 26, 2021
/s/ John A. Mendez
THE HONORABLE JOHN A. MENDEZ
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?