(HC) Shah v. Alpine County Superior Court

Filing 10

ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 4/26/2021 ADOPTING the findings and recommendations filed 3/15/2021, ECF No. 8 , in full; and DISMISSING the Petitioner's application for writ of habeas corpus.(Becknal, R)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 FERNANDO SHAH, 12 Petitioner, 13 14 No. 2:21-cv-0232 JAM AC P v. ORDER ALPINE COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT, 15 Respondent. 16 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas 17 18 corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate 19 Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On March 15, 2021, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 20 21 which were served on petitioner and which contained notice to petitioner that any objections to 22 the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. ECF No. 8. Petitioner 23 has not filed objections to the findings and recommendations. The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 24 25 supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY 26 ORDERED that: 1. The findings and recommendations filed March 15, 2021, ECF No. 8, are adopted in 27 28 full; 1 1 2. Petitioner’s application for writ of habeas corpus is dismissed. 2 3 4 DATED: April 26, 2021 /s/ John A. Mendez THE HONORABLE JOHN A. MENDEZ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?