(HC) Jaimes v. Unknown
Filing
6
ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 6/4/2021 ORDERING Clerk to randomly assign a district judge to this action and RECOMMENDING this action be dismissed without prejudice. Assigned and referred to Judge Kimberly J. Mueller. Objections due within 30 days after being served with these findings and recommendations. (Henshaw, R)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
DAVID JAVIER JAIMES,
12
Petitioner,
13
14
No. 2:21-cv-00237 DB P
v.
ORDER
UNKNOWN,
15
Respondent.
16
Petitioner, a state prisoner at Pelican Bay State Prison, filed an unsigned Petition for Writ
17
18
of Habeas Corpus on February 8, 2021. (ECF No. 1.) Petitioner did not pay the required filing
19
fee or submit an application to proceed in forma pauperis.
On February 19, 2021, the court ordered petitioner to refile a signed petition as well as
20
21
either pay the required filing fee or submit an application to proceed in forma pauperis. (ECF No.
22
3.) Petitioner was given thirty days from the date of the court’s order to refile a petition and filing
23
fee or application to proceed in forma pauperis. (Id.) Those thirty days have passed. Petitioner
24
has not filed a signed habeas petition, paid the filing fee, submitted an application to proceed in
25
forma pauperis, requested an extension of time, or otherwise responded to the court’s order.
26
Accordingly, the court will recommend that this action be dismissed for failure to prosecute and
27
failure to comply with court orders.
28
////
1
1
2
3
4
5
For the reasons state above, the Clerk of the Court is ORDERED to randomly assign a
district judge to this action.
IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See
Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).
These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge
6
assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within thirty days after
7
being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with
8
the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned
9
“Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that
10
failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District
11
Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).
12
Dated: June 4, 2021
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
DB:14
DB:1/Prisoner/Habeas /R/jaim0237.fr.dism
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?