(HC) Jaimes v. Unknown

Filing 6

ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 6/4/2021 ORDERING Clerk to randomly assign a district judge to this action and RECOMMENDING this action be dismissed without prejudice. Assigned and referred to Judge Kimberly J. Mueller. Objections due within 30 days after being served with these findings and recommendations. (Henshaw, R)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DAVID JAVIER JAIMES, 12 Petitioner, 13 14 No. 2:21-cv-00237 DB P v. ORDER UNKNOWN, 15 Respondent. 16 Petitioner, a state prisoner at Pelican Bay State Prison, filed an unsigned Petition for Writ 17 18 of Habeas Corpus on February 8, 2021. (ECF No. 1.) Petitioner did not pay the required filing 19 fee or submit an application to proceed in forma pauperis. On February 19, 2021, the court ordered petitioner to refile a signed petition as well as 20 21 either pay the required filing fee or submit an application to proceed in forma pauperis. (ECF No. 22 3.) Petitioner was given thirty days from the date of the court’s order to refile a petition and filing 23 fee or application to proceed in forma pauperis. (Id.) Those thirty days have passed. Petitioner 24 has not filed a signed habeas petition, paid the filing fee, submitted an application to proceed in 25 forma pauperis, requested an extension of time, or otherwise responded to the court’s order. 26 Accordingly, the court will recommend that this action be dismissed for failure to prosecute and 27 failure to comply with court orders. 28 //// 1 1 2 3 4 5 For the reasons state above, the Clerk of the Court is ORDERED to randomly assign a district judge to this action. IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 6 assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within thirty days after 7 being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with 8 the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned 9 “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that 10 failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District 11 Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 12 Dated: June 4, 2021 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 DB:14 DB:1/Prisoner/Habeas /R/jaim0237.fr.dism 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?