(PC) Edwards v. Kuersten

Filing 10

ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 4/26/2021; ADOPTING 6 The Findings and Recommendations in full; DENYING 2 Motion to Proceed IFP. (Mena-Sanchez, L)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

DAVID E. EDWARDS,

12

No. 2:21-cv-0259-JAM-EFB P

Plaintiff,

13

v.

14

M. KUERSTEN,

15

ORDER

Defendant.

16
17

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief

18

under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to

19

28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

20

On March 9, 2021, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which

21

were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings

22

and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff has not filed objections to

23

the findings and recommendations.1

24

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be

25

supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY

26

ORDERED that:

27
28

1

Plaintiff paid the filing fee in full on March 22, 2021.
1

1

1. The findings and recommendations filed March 9, 2021, are adopted in full; and

2

2. Plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 2) is denied.

3
4
5
6

DATED: April 26, 2021

/s/ John A. Mendez
THE HONORABLE JOHN A. MENDEZ
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2