(PC) Edwards v. Kuersten
Filing
10
ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 4/26/2021; ADOPTING 6 The Findings and Recommendations in full; DENYING 2 Motion to Proceed IFP. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
DAVID E. EDWARDS,
12
No. 2:21-cv-0259-JAM-EFB P
Plaintiff,
13
v.
14
M. KUERSTEN,
15
ORDER
Defendant.
16
17
Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief
18
under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to
19
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
20
On March 9, 2021, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which
21
were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings
22
and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff has not filed objections to
23
the findings and recommendations.1
24
The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be
25
supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY
26
ORDERED that:
27
28
1
Plaintiff paid the filing fee in full on March 22, 2021.
1
1
1. The findings and recommendations filed March 9, 2021, are adopted in full; and
2
2. Plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 2) is denied.
3
4
5
6
DATED: April 26, 2021
/s/ John A. Mendez
THE HONORABLE JOHN A. MENDEZ
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?