(PC) Brady v. Jones et al
Filing
22
ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 7/14/2021 ADOPTING 13 The Findings and Recommendations in full; DENYING 6 Motion for Preliminary Injunction.(Mena-Sanchez, L)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
PATRICK BRADY,
12
13
14
15
No. 2:21-cv-00489-TLN-AC
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER
SCOTT JONES, et al.,
Defendants.
16
17
Plaintiff Patrick Brady (“Plaintiff”), a federal pretrial detainee proceeding pro se, has filed
18
this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United
19
States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
20
On May 12, 2021, the magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations herein
21
which were served on Plaintiff and which contained notice to Plaintiff that any objections to the
22
findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. (ECF No. 13.) Plaintiff
23
has not filed any timely objections to the findings and recommendations.
24
The Court has reviewed the file under the applicable legal standards and finds the findings
25
and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis.
26
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
27
28
1. The Findings and Recommendations issued May 12, 2021 (ECF No. 13), are
ADOPTED IN FULL; and
1
1
2. Plaintiff’s Motion for a Preliminary Injunction (ECF No. 6) is DENIED.
2
IT IS SO ORDERED.
3
DATED: July 14, 2021
4
5
6
7
Troy L. Nunley
United States District Judge
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?