(PC) Adkins v. Hurtado
Filing
33
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Jeremy D. Peterson on 5/05/2022 DENYING 32 Request for Discovery.(Perdue, C.)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
DUPREE LAMONT ADKINS,
11
Plaintiff,
12
13
Case No. 2:21-cv-00531-TLN-JDP (PC)
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION
FOR DISCOVERY
v.
ECF No. 32
D. HURTADO, et al.,
14
Defendants.
15
Plaintiff has filed a document in which he requests that defendants produce documents
16
17
and respond to interrogatories. ECF No. 32.
Discovery requests shall be filed with the court only if they are at issue. See E.D. Cal.
18
19
L.R. 250.2-250.4. Currently, there is no court proceeding that requires review of plaintiff’s
20
discovery requests. To the extent that plaintiff intended to serve defendants with his discovery
21
request by filing them with the court, that approach is improper. Plaintiff must instead serve his
22
discovery requests on defendants. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 30-36. Accordingly, it is hereby
23
ORDERED that plaintiff’s motion for discovery, ECF No. 32, is denied.
24
IT IS SO ORDERED.
25
26
27
Dated:
May 5, 2022
JEREMY D. PETERSON
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
28
1
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?