(PC) Coleman v. California Department of Corrections, et al.

Filing 20

ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 1/10/22 ADOPTING in full 6 Findings and Recommendations and DENYING 3 Plaintiff Coleman's "motion for emergency injunctive relief and order deeming plaintiffs' administrative remedies exhausted". (Kastilahn, A)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

SAAHDI ABDUL COLEMAN,

12
13
14
15

No. 2:21-cv-00625-TLN-EFB

Plaintiff,
v.

ORDER

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF
CORRECTIONS, et al.,
Defendants.

16
17
18

Plaintiff Saahdi Abdul Coleman, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil

19

rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States

20

Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

21

On June 25, 2021, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which

22

were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings

23

and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. (ECF No. 6.) Plaintiff has filed

24

objections to the findings and recommendations. (ECF No. 16.)

25

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this

26

Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the

27

Court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper

28

analysis.
1

1

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

2

1. The findings and recommendations filed June 25, 2021, (ECF No. 6), are adopted in

3
4

full; and
2. Plaintiff Coleman’s “motion for emergency injunctive relief and order deeming

5

plaintiffs’ administrative remedies exhausted” (ECF No. 3) is DENIED.

6

DATED: January 10, 2022

7
8
9
10

Troy L. Nunley
United States District Judge

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2