Guitron v. Teva Pharmaceuticals, USA, Inc. et al

Filing 13

MDL ORDER. CASE TRANSFERRED to the Northern District of Georgia. CASE CLOSED. ELECTRONIC TRANSFER SENT. (Donati, J)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL on MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION IN RE: PARAGARD IUD PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION FILED Apr 27, 2021 CLERK, U.S. DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA MDL No. 2974 (SEE ATTACHED SCHEDULE) CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO −16) On December 16, 2020, the Panel transferred 49 civil action(s) to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407. See _F.Supp.3d_ (J.P.M.L. 2020). Since that time, 103 additional action(s) have been transferred to the Northern District of Georgia. With the consent of that court, all such actions have been assigned to the Honorable Leigh Martin May. It appears that the action(s) on this conditional transfer order involve questions of fact that are common to the actions previously transferred to the Northern District of Georgia and assigned to Judge May. Pursuant to Rule 7.1 of the Rules of Procedure of the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, the action(s) on the attached schedule are transferred under 28 U.S.C. § 1407 to the Northern District of Georgia for the reasons stated in the order of December 16, 2020, and, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Leigh Martin May. This order does not become effective until it is filed in the Office of the Clerk of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia. The transmittal of this order to said Clerk shall be stayed 7 days from the entry thereof. If any party files a notice of opposition with the Clerk of the Panel within this 7−day period, the stay will be continued until further order of the Panel. FOR THE PANEL: Apr 26, 2021 ATTEST: A TRUE COPY CERTIFIED THIS John W. Nichols Clerk of the Panel 4/26/2021 Date: __________________________ JAMES N. HATTEN, Clerk s/ T. Frazier By: ____________________________ Deputy Clerk IN RE: PARAGARD IUD PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION MDL No. 2974 SCHEDULE CTO−16 − TAG−ALONG ACTIONS DIST DIV. C.A.NO. CASE CAPTION CALIFORNIA CENTRAL CAC 2 21−02780 Caley Joyner v. Teva Pharmaceuticals, USA, Inc. et al CALIFORNIA EASTERN CAE CAE 2 2 21−00626 21−00629 Guitron v. Teva Pharmaceuticals, USA, Inc. et al Romero v. Teva Pharmaceuticals, USA, Inc. et al CALIFORNIA NORTHERN CAN 4 21−02246 Barnes v. Teva Pharmaceuticals, USA et al 1 21−00985 Tlamayo v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. et al 21−00321 Capps v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. et al 21−01705 Rosen v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. et al 21−10605 Fulani v. Teva Pharmaceuticals Industries Ltd. et al COLORADO CO FLORIDA MIDDLE FLM 3 ILLINOIS NORTHERN ILN 1 MASSACHUSETTS MA 1 NEW YORK NORTHERN NYN 5 21−00393 Jonza v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. et al 21−01315 Lapp v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. et al OHIO SOUTHERN OHS 2 Opposed 4/23/21 TEXAS SOUTHERN TXS 4 21−01155 Longoria v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. et al 21−00282 Del Rosario v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. et al 21−00393 Hill v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. et al TEXAS WESTERN TXW 1 WISCONSIN EASTERN WIE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?