(SS) Maxwell v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 13

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota on 11/19/21, REMANDING case to the Commissioner of Social Security for further proceedings consistent with the terms of the Stipulation to Remand. CASE CLOSED (Benson, A.)

Download PDF
8 PHILIP A. TALBERT Acting United States Attorney CHRISTOPHER HARRIS Regional Chief Counsel, Region VI Social Security Administration KENDALL REES WA bar #20030 Special Assistant United States Attorney Office of the General Counsel – Suite 350 Social Security Administration 1301 Young Street, Mailroom 104 Dallas, Texas 75202 Telephone: 214.767.3757 E-Mail: Kendall.Rees@ssa.gov 9 Attorneys for Defendant 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 SACRAMENTO DIVISION 13 14 15 16 17 JEALENA MAXWELL, Plaintiff, v. KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. 18 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL NO. 2:21-cv-00680-DMC STIPULATION TO VOLUNTARY REMAND PURSUANT TO SENTENCE FOUR OF 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) AND TO ENTRY OF JUDGMENT; ORDER 19 20 IT IS STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant Kilolo 21 Kijakazi, Acting Commissioner of Social Security (“Defendant”), through their undersigned 22 counsel of record, that the above-entitled action shall be remanded to the Commissioner of 23 Social Security for further administrative proceedings. 24 25 26 27 Upon remand, the Office of Hearing Operations will remand the case to an Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) for a new decision, and instruct the ALJ to re-evaluate the evidence of record. In doing so, the ALJ will offer Plaintiff the opportunity for a new hearing, take further action as necessary to complete the administrative record, and issue a new decision. 28 Stip. to Remand; 2:21-cv-00680-DMC 1 The parties further request that the Court direct the Clerk of the Court to enter a final judgment 2 in favor of Plaintiff, and against Defendant, reversing the final decision of the Commissioner. 3 4 5 This stipulation constitutes a remand under the fourth sentence of Section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. 405(g). Respectfully submitted this 5th day of November 2021. 6 7 Dated: November 8, 2021 */s/ Jacqueline Anna Forslund Jacqueline Anna Forslund Attorney for Plaintiff *Authorized via e-mail on November 6, 2021 Dated: November 8, 2021 PHILIP A. TALBERT Acting United States Attorney CHRISTOPHER HARRIS Regional Chief Counsel, Region VI Social Security Administration 8 9 10 11 12 13 By: 15 /s/ Kendall Rees KENDALL REES Special Assistant United States Attorney 16 Attorneys for Defendant 14 17 18 19 20 21 ORDER Based upon the parties’ Stipulation to Voluntary Remand Pursuant to Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) and to Entry of Judgment (“Stipulation to Remand”), and for cause shown, IT IS ORDERED that the above-captioned action is remanded to the Commissioner of Social Security for further proceedings consistent with the terms of the Stipulation to Remand. 22 23 Dated: November 19, 2021 ____________________________________ DENNIS M. COTA UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 24 25 26 27 28 Stip. to Remand; 2:21-cv-00680-DMC

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?