(PC) James v. Elk Grove Police Department
Filing
22
ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 1/10/22 ADOPTING in full #20 Findings and Recommendations and DISMISSING this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915A. CASE CLOSED (Kastilahn, A)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
RONALD EUGENE JAMES,
12
13
14
No. 2:21-cv-00683-TLN-EFB
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER
ELK GROVE POLICE DEPARTMENT,
15
Defendant.
16
17
Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief
18
under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to
19
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
20
On October 14, 2021, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein
21
which were served on Plaintiff and which contained notice to Plaintiff that any objections to the
22
findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. (ECF No. 20.) Plaintiff has
23
not filed objections to the findings and recommendations.
24
The Court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be
25
supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY
26
ORDERED that:
27
28
1. The findings and recommendations filed October 14, 2021, (ECF No. 20), are adopted
in full; and
1
1
2
2. This action is dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A.
DATED: January 10, 2022
3
4
5
6
Troy L. Nunley
United States District Judge
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?