(PS) Gaines v. Langurand

Filing 19

ORDER signed by Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 3/25/24 ADOPTING in full 18 Findings and Recommendations and GRANTING IN PART 13 Defendant's motion to dismiss. Plaintiff's official capacity claims for damages, including punitive damages, are DISMISSED without leave to amend. Plaintiff's non-official capacity state law claims are DISMISSED without prejudice to refiling in a court of competent jurisdiction after plaintiff has complied with the California Government Claims Act. The motion to dismiss is DENIED in all other respects. This matter is REFERRED back to the assigned magistrate judge for all further pretrial proceedings. (Kastilahn, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JENNIFER GAINES, 12 13 14 15 Case No. 2:21-cv-00808-KJM-JDP (PS) Plaintiff, v. ORDER CARL LANGURAND, Defendant. 16 17 On February 12, 2024, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which 18 were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and 19 recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. No objections were filed. 20 The court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 21 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed 22 de novo. See Robbins v. Carey, 481 F.3d 1143, 1147 (9th Cir. 2007) (“[D]eterminations of law 23 by the magistrate judge are reviewed de novo by both the district court and [the appellate] court 24 . . . .”). Having reviewed the file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be 25 supported by the record and by the proper analysis, with one minor modification. 26 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 27 1. The Findings and Recommendations filed February 12, 2024, are ADOPTED; 28 2. Defendant’s motion to dismiss, ECF No. 13, is GRANTED IN PART; 1 2 3 3. Plaintiff’s official capacity claims for damages, including punitive damages, are DISMISSED without leave to amend; 4. Plaintiff’s non-official capacity state law claims are DISMISSED without prejudice to 4 refiling in a court of competent jurisdiction after plaintiff has complied with the 5 California Government Claims Act; 6 5. The motion to dismiss is DENIED in all other respects; and 7 6. This matter is referred back to the assigned magistrate judge for all further pretrial 8 9 proceedings. DATED: March 25, 2024. 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?