(HC) Felix v. Thompson

Filing 14

ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 1/10/22 ADOPTING in full 10 Findings and Recommendations and GRANTING 7 Respondent's Motion to Dismiss. Petitioner's petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 is DISMISSED. CASE CLOSED (Kastilahn, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 FRANCISCO GUERRA FELIX, 12 Petitioner, 13 14 No. 2:21-cv-00835-TLN -CKD v. ORDER PAUL THOMPSON, 15 Respondent. 16 Petitioner, a federal prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this application for a writ of 17 18 habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. The matter was referred to a United States 19 Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 20 On November 12, 2021, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 21 which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to 22 the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. (ECF No. 10.) 23 Petitioner has filed objections to the findings and recommendations. (ECF No 12.) In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this 24 25 Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the 26 Court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper 27 analysis. 28 /// 1 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. The findings and recommendations filed November 12, 2021, (ECF No. 10) are 3 adopted in full; 4 2. Respondent’s motion to dismiss (ECF No. 7) is GRANTED; 5 3. Petitioner’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 is 6 7 8 dismissed; and 4. This case is closed. DATED: January 10, 2022 9 10 11 12 Troy L. Nunley United States District Judge 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?