(PC) Lewis v. Velasquez-Miranda et al

Filing 86

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 08/01/22, ( Settlement Conference set for 10/27/2022 at 01:00 PM in Redding (DMC) before Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota.) The settlement conference will be conducted by remote means, with all pa rties appearing by Zoom video conference. Parties are directed to submit confidential settlement statements no later than October 20, 2022 to [e-mail]. Plaintiff shall mail his confidential settlement statement Attn: Magistrat e Judge Dennis M. Cota, USDC CAED, 2986 Bechelli Lane, Suite 300, Redding, California 96002 so it arrives no later than October 20, 2022. The envelope shall be marked "CONFIDENTIAL SETTLEMENT STATEMENT." Parties are also directed to file a "Notice of Submission of Confidential Settlement Statement" The Clerk of the Court is directed to serve a copy of this order on the Litigation Office at the RJ Donovan Correctional Facility via facsimile at [phone] or via email. (cc: ADR and DMC)(Plummer, M)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

10

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11
12

DARONTA TYRONE LEWIS,

13

Plaintiff,

14
15

No. 2:21-cv-0932-TLN-EFB (PC)

v.
M. VELASQUEZ-MIRANDA, et al.,

16

ORDER SETTING SETTLEMENT
CONFERENCE

Defendants.

17
Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 42

18
19

U.S.C. §1983. The court has determined that this case will benefit from a settlement conference.

20

Therefore, this case will be referred to Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota to conduct a settlement

21

conference on October 27, 2022 at 1:00 p.m. The settlement conference will be conducted by

22

remote means, with all parties appearing by Zoom video conference. The Court will issue the

23

necessary transportation order in due course.

24

In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

25

1. This case is set for a settlement conference before Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota

26

on October 27, 2022 at 1:00 p.m. The settlement conference will be conducted by

27

remote means, with all parties appearing by Zoom video conference.

28

/////
1

1
2

2. A representative with full and unlimited authority to negotiate and enter into a binding
settlement on the defendants’ behalf shall attend in person 1.

3
4

3. Those in attendance must be prepared to discuss the claims, defenses and damages.

5

The failure of any counsel, party or authorized person subject to this order to appear in

6

person may result in the imposition of sanctions. In addition, the conference will not

7

proceed and will be reset to another date.

8

4. Parties are directed to submit confidential settlement statements no later than October

9

20, 2022 to [e-mail]. Plaintiff shall mail his confidential

10

settlement statement Attn: Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota, USDC CAED, 2986

11

Bechelli Lane, Suite 300, Redding, California 96002 so it arrives no later than October

12

20, 2022. The envelope shall be marked “CONFIDENTIAL SETTLEMENT

13

STATEMENT.” Parties are also directed to file a “Notice of Submission of

14

Confidential Settlement Statement” (See L.R. 270(d)).

15
16

Settlement statements should not be filed with the Clerk of the Court nor served on

17

any other party. Settlement statements shall be clearly marked “confidential” with

18

the date and time of the settlement conference indicated prominently thereon.

19

/////

20

/////

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

1

While the exercise of its authority is subject to abuse of discretion review, “the district court has the
authority to order parties, including the federal government, to participate in mandatory settlement
conferences… .” United States v. United States District Court for the Northern Mariana Islands, 694 F.3d 1051,
1053, 1057, 1059 (9th Cir. 2012)(“the district court has broad authority to compel participation in mandatory
settlement conference[s].”). The term “full authority to settle” means that the individuals attending the
mediation conference must be authorized to fully explore settlement options and to agree at that time to any
settlement terms acceptable to the parties. G. Heileman Brewing Co., Inc. v. Joseph Oat Corp., 871 F.2d 648,
653 (7th Cir. 1989), cited with approval in Official Airline Guides, Inc. v. Goss, 6 F.3d 1385, 1396 (9th Cir. 1993).
The individual with full authority to settle must also have “unfettered discretion and authority” to change the
settlement position of the party, if appropriate. Pitman v. Brinker Int’l., Inc., 216 F.R.D. 481, 485-86 (D. Ariz.
2003), amended on recon. in part, Pitman v. Brinker Int’l., Inc., 2003 WL 23353478 (D. Ariz. 2003). The
purpose behind requiring the attendance of a person with full settlement authority is that the parties’ view of
the case may be altered during the face to face conference. Pitman, 216 F.R.D. at 486. An authorization to
settle for a limited dollar amount or sum certain can be found not to comply with the requirement of full
authority to settle. Nick v. Morgan’s Foods, Inc., 270 F.3d 590, 596-97 (8th Cir. 2001).

2

1
2

The confidential settlement statement shall be no longer than five pages in length,

3

typed or neatly printed, and include the following:

4

a. A brief statement of the facts of the case.

5

b. A brief statement of the claims and defenses, i.e., statutory or other grounds upon

6

which the claims are founded; a forthright evaluation of the parties’ likelihood of

7

prevailing on the claims and defenses; and a description of the major issues in

8

dispute.

9
10
11

c. A summary of the proceedings to date.
d. An estimate of the cost and time to be expended for further discovery, pretrial, and
trial.

12

e. The relief sought.

13

f. The party’s position on settlement, including present demands and offers and a

14
15
16
17

history of past settlement discussions, offers, and demands.
g. A brief statement of each party’s expectations and goals for the settlement
conference, including how much a party is willing to accept and/or willing to pay.
h. If the parties intend to discuss the joint settlement of any other actions or claims

18

not in this suit, give a brief description of each action or claim as set forth above,

19

including case number(s) if applicable.

20

5. Judge Cota or another representative from the court will be contacting the parties

21

either by telephone or in person, approximately two weeks prior to the settlement

22

conference, to ascertain each party’s expectations of the settlement conference.

23
24
25

6. The Clerk of the Court is directed to serve a copy of this order on the Litigation Office
at the RJ Donovan Correctional Facility via facsimile at [phone] or via email.
Dated: August 1, 2022.

26
27
28
3