(PS) Bernhard et al v. County of San Joaquin et al

Filing 29

ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 9/1/2023 ADOPTING 28 Findings and Recommendations in full, DISMISSING this action without prejudice and DENYING as moot 27 Motion to Dismiss. CASE CLOSED. (Clemente Licea, O)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11
12

LLOYD THOMAS BERNARD, II;
STEPHANIE CELESTE TEJADAOTERO,

13

Plaintiffs,

14
15

No. 2:21-cv-00948-TLN-DB

ORDER

v.
COUNTY OF SAN JOAQUIN, et al.,

16

Defendants.

17
Plaintiffs are proceeding in this action pro se. The matter was referred to a United States

18
19

Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21).
On May 23, 2023, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which

20
21

were served on Plaintiffs, and which contained notice to Plaintiff that any objections to the

22

findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days after service of the findings

23

and recommendations. The time for filling objections has expired, and Plaintiffs did not file any

24

objections to the findings and recommendations.
The Court reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported

25
26

by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis.

27

///

28

///
1

1

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

2

1. The findings and recommendations filed May 23, 2023 (ECF No. 28) are ADOPTED

3

IN FULL;

4

2. This action is DISMISSED without prejudice;

5

3. Defendants’ April 18, 2023 motion to dismiss (ECF No. 27) is DENIED as moot; and

6
7

4. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case.
DATE: September 1, 2023

8
9
10
11

Troy L. Nunley
United States District Judge

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2