Spencer v. Honda Motor Corp., Ltd. et al
Filing
37
ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 8/10/2022 ORDERING 22 Discovery is hereby STAYED until such time as the Court rules upon 10 the Motion to Dismiss.(Reader, L)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
William A. Delgado (SBN 222666)
wdelgado@dtolaw.com
Lauren Hudecki (SBN 276938)
lhudecki@dtolaw.com
DTO LAW
601 S. Figueroa Street, Suite 2130
Los Angeles, CA 90017
Telephone: (213) 335-6999
Facsimile: (213) 335-7802
Attorneys for Defendants
HONDA MOTOR CORP. LTD. AND
AMERICAN HONDA MOTOR CO., INC.
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
SHAWN SPENCER, individually on
behalf of himself and all others similarly
situated,
13
Plaintiffs,
14
15
16
17
v.
HONDA MOTOR CORP. LTD., a
Japanese corporation; AMERICAN
HONDA MOTOR CO., INC., a
California corporation; and DOES 1
through 10, inclusive,
18
Case No.: 2:21-cv-00988-JAM-DMC
Hon. John A. Mendez
U.S. Magistrate Dennis M. Cota
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO
STAY DISCOVERY PENDING
RESOLUTION OF MOTION TO
DISMISS
Defendants.
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO STAY CASE PENDING RESOLUTION OF MTD
226476.1
1
ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION TO STAY DISCOVERY
2
For good cause shown, the Court approves the Stipulation to Stay Discovery
3
Pending Resolution of Motion to Dismiss entered into between Plaintiff Shawn
4
Spencer (“Plaintiff”) and Defendants Honda Motor Co., Ltd. (incorrectly named as
5
Honda Motor Corp., Ltd. (“HMC”) and American Honda Motor Co., Inc. (“AHM”)
6
(HMC and AHM together, the “Honda Defendants”), by and through their respective
7
counsel.
8
9
Discovery is hereby STAYED until such time as the Court rules upon the
Honda Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. No. 10).
10
11
IT IS SO ORDERED.
12
13
14
DATED: August 10, 2022
15
/s/ John A. Mendez
THE HONORABLE JOHN A. MENDEZ
SENIOR UNITED STATES DISRICT JUDGE
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO STAY CASE PENDING RESOLUTION OF MTD
226476.1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?