Wells v. DCI Donor Services, Inc.

Filing 35

CONSENT ORDER signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 05/09/24 REASSIGNING this matter to Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney for all further proceedings and entry of final judgment. Any hearing dates currently set before the undersigned are VACATED. The case number on all future filings shall be: 2:21-cv-0994 CKD (cc: DAD). (Benson, A.)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MARIAH WELLS, 12 13 14 Plaintiff, v. NEW CASE NUMBER: 2:21-cv-00994-CKD DCI DONOR SERVICES, INC., 15 No. 2:21-cv-00994-DAD-CKD ORDER REASSIGNING CASE Defendant. 16 17 Each of the parties in the above-captioned case has filed a “Consent to Proceed Before a 18 United States Magistrate.” See 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). According to Local Rule 305, both the 19 district court judge assigned to the case and the magistrate judge must approve the reference to 20 the magistrate judge. 21 The undersigned has reviewed the file herein and recommends that the above-captioned 22 case be assigned and referred to the magistrate judge for all further proceedings and entry of final 23 judgment. 24 Accordingly, it is ordered that this matter be reassigned from the docket of United States 25 District Judge Dale A. Drozd to the docket of United States Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. 26 Delaney, for all purposes including trial and entry of judgment. All currently scheduled dates, if 27 any, presently set before Judge Drozd are hereby vacated. The parties shall take note that all 28 future documents filed with the Clerk of the Court shall bear case number: 2:21-cv-00994-CKD. 1 1 IT IS SO ORDERED. 2 3 Dated: May 9, 2024 DALE A. DROZD UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 4 5 6 Having also reviewed the file, I accept reference of this case for all further proceedings and entry of final judgment. 7 8 Dated: 05/10/24 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?