(PS) Sarkis v. Yolo County Public Agency Risk Mgt. Ins. Authority et al

Filing 17

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Jeremy D. Peterson on 5/5/2022 DENYING 9 Motion for Electronic Case Filing. (Coll, A)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

ARMOND SARKIS,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14
15

v.
YOLO COUNTY PUBLIC AGENCY
RISK MANAGEMENT INSURANCE
AUTHORITY, et al.,

16

Case No. 2:21-cv-01097-TLN-JDP (PS)
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR
PERMISSION FOR ELECTRONIC CASE
FILING
ECF No. 9

Defendants.

17
Plaintiff moves to participate in electronic case filing. ECF No. 9. Generally, “any person

18
19

appearing pro se may not utilize electronic filing except with permission of the assigned Judge or

20

Magistrate Judge.” Local Rule 133(b)(2). Plaintiff’s motion does not provide good cause for a

21

departure from the normal filing procedure for unrepresented litigants. If the case proceeds and

22

plaintiff has not abused the filing procedures, the court may entertain another motion. At the

23

current stage, however, plaintiff’s motion for electronic filing is denied without prejudice. ECF

24

No. 9.

25
26

IT IS SO ORDERED.

27
Dated:
28

May 5, 2022
JEREMY D. PETERSON

1

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2