(HC) Miles v. People of the State of California et al
Filing
10
ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 1/6/2022 ADOPTING in FULL 8 Findings and Recommendations. This action is DISMISSED, without prejudice for lack of prosecution and for failure to comply with the Court's order. CASE CLOSED(Reader, L)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
MAURICE MILES, SR.,
12
Petitioner,
13
14
15
No. 2:21-cv-01143-TLN-GGH
v.
ORDER
PEOPLE OF THE STATE
OFCALIFORNIA, et al.,
Respondents.
16
Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas
17
18
corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge
19
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
On October 28, 2021, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein
20
21
which were served on Petitioner and which contained notice to Petitioner that any objections to
22
the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. (ECF No. 8.) Petitioner
23
has not filed objections to the findings and recommendations.
The Court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be
24
25
supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY
26
ORDERED that:
1. The findings and recommendations filed October 28, 2021, (ECF No. 8) are adopted in
27
28
full;
1
1
2. This action is dismissed, without prejudice, for lack of prosecution and for failure to
2
comply with the Court’s order. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); Local Rule 110.
3
DATED: January 6, 2022
4
5
6
7
Troy L. Nunley
United States District Judge
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?