(PS)Jefferson-Henkel v. County of Solano et al

Filing 3

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 7/19/2021 GRANTING #2 Motion to Proceed IFP. Service is appropriate for the following defendants:County of Solano, City of Vacaville, Thomas A. Ferrara, Sheriff A. Miller, Deputy Sheriff Venus Azar, Medical Examiner. (cc: USM) (Mena-Sanchez, L)

Case 2:21-cv-01197-MCE-AC Document 3 Filed 07/19/21 Page 1 of 4
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

KIM JEFFERSON-HENKEL,

12
13
14
15

No. 2:21-cv-01197 MCE AC PS

Plaintiff,
v.

ORDER

COUNTY OF SOLANO, et al.,
Defendants.

16
17
18

Plaintiff is proceeding in this action pro se, and the action was accordingly referred to the
undersigned for pretrial proceedings by E.D. Cal. R. (“Local Rule”) 302(c)(21).

19

Plaintiff has requested authority pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 to proceed in forma

20

pauperis (“IFP”). Plaintiff has submitted the affidavit required by Section 1915(a) showing that

21

plaintiff is unable to prepay fees and costs or give security for them. ECF No. 2. Accordingly,

22

the request to proceed in forma pauperis will be granted. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a).

23

I. SCREENING

24

Granting IFP status does not end the court’s inquiry. The federal IFP statute requires

25

federal courts to dismiss a case if the action is legally “frivolous or malicious,” fails to state a

26

claim upon which relief may be granted, or seeks monetary relief from a defendant who is

27

immune from such relief. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). The court finds that, for screening purposes

28

only, plaintiff’s claims are sufficiently cognizable.
1

Case 2:21-cv-01197-MCE-AC Document 3 Filed 07/19/21 Page 2 of 4
1

II. CONCLUSION

2

For the reasons stated above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

3

1. Plaintiff's request for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 2), is GRANTED.

4

2. Service is appropriate for the following defendants:

5

o County of Solano

6

o City of Vacaville

7

o Thomas A. Ferrara, Sheriff

8

o A. Miller, Deputy Sheriff

9

o Venus Azar, Medical Examiner

10

3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to issue forthwith, and the U.S. Marshal is directed

11

to serve within ninety days of the date of this order, all process pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil

12

Procedure 4, without prepayment of costs.

13
14

4. The Clerk of the Court shall send plaintiff the above: one USM-285, one summons, a
copy of the complaint, and an appropriate form for consent to trial by a magistrate judge.

15

5. Plaintiff is directed to supply the U.S. Marshal, within 15 days from the date this order

16

is filed, all information needed by the Marshal to effect service of process, and shall promptly file

17

a statement with the court that said documents have been submitted to the United States Marshal.

18

The court anticipates that, to effect service, the U.S. Marshal will require, for each defendant in

19

¶ 3, above, at least:

20

a. One completed summons;

21

b. One completed USM-285 form;

22

c. One copy of the endorsed filed complaint, with an extra copy for the U.S.

23

Marshal;

24

d. One copy of the instant order; and

25

e. An appropriate form for consent to trial by a magistrate judge.

26

6. In the event the U.S. Marshal is unable, for any reason whatsoever, to effect service on

27

any defendant within 90 days from the date of this order, the Marshal is directed to report that

28

fact, and the reasons for it, to the undersigned.
2

Case 2:21-cv-01197-MCE-AC Document 3 Filed 07/19/21 Page 3 of 4
1
2
3
4
5
6

7. The Clerk of the Court is directed to serve a copy of this order on the U.S. Marshal,
501 “I” Street, Sacramento, Ca., 95814, Tel. No. [phone].
8. Failure to comply with this order may result in a recommendation that this action be
dismissed.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: July 19, 2021

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3

Case 2:21-cv-01197-MCE-AC Document 3 Filed 07/19/21 Page 4 of 4
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

KIM JEFFERSON-HENKEL,

12
13
14

No. 2:21-cv-1197 MCE AC (PS)

Plaintiff,
v.

NOTICE OF SUBMISSION

COUNTY OF SOLANO, et al.,

15

Defendants.

16
17
18

Plaintiff has submitted the following documents to the U.S. Marshal, in compliance with
the court’s order filed _____________________:

19

____

completed summons form

20

____

completed USM-285 form

21

____ copy of the complaint

22

____

completed form to consent or decline to consent to magistrate judge jurisdiction

23
24

____________________________________
Date

____________________________________
Plaintiff’s Signature

25
26
27
28
1