(HC) Sifuentez v. Unknown
Filing
25
ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 05/06/2022 ADOPTING 24 Findings and Recommendations in full; GRANTING 20 Motion to Dismiss First Amended Petition. The court declines to issue the Certificate of Appealability. CASE CLOSED. (Rodriguez, E)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
RANDY SIFUENTEZ,
12
13
14
No. 2:21-cv-01244-WBS-JDP (HC)
Petitioner,
v.
ORDER
UNKNOWN,
15
Respondent.
16
17
Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas
18
corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate
19
Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
20
On April 8, 2022, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which
21
were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the
22
findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Neither party has filed
23
objections to the findings and recommendations.
24
The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be
25
supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY
26
ORDERED that:
27
1. The findings and recommendations filed April 8, 2022, are adopted in full;
28
2. Respondent’s motion to dismiss, ECF No. 20, is granted;
1
1
3. The first amended petition is dismissed; and
2
4. The court declines to issue the certificate of appealability referenced in 28 U.S.C. §
3
2253.
4
Dated: May 6, 2022
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?