(PC) Bennett v. Burton et al
Filing
50
ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 01/17/2023 ADOPTING 45 Findings and Recommendations in full. Defendant Burton is DISMISSED from this action with prejudice. (Rodriguez, E)
Case 2:21-cv-01340-WBS-KJN Document 50 Filed 01/18/23 Page 1 of 2
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
JONATHAN BENNETT,
12
13
14
15
No. 2:21-cv-1340 WBS KJN P
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER
ROBERT BURTON, et al.,
Defendants.
16
17
Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights action seeking relief
18
under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to
19
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
20
On December 12, 2022, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein
21
which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to
22
the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. Neither party filed
23
objections to the findings and recommendations.
24
The court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602
25
F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo.
26
See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). Having
27
reviewed the file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record
28
and by the magistrate judge’s analysis.
1
Case 2:21-cv-01340-WBS-KJN Document 50 Filed 01/18/23 Page 2 of 2
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
2
1. The findings and recommendations filed December 12, 2022, are adopted in full; and
3
2. Defendant Burton is dismissed from this action with prejudice.
4
Dated: January 17, 2023
5
6
7
/benn21cv1340.801
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?