(PC) Kyle v. Naman et al
Filing
13
ORDER signed by Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 1/7/2022 ADOPTING 12 Findings and Recommendations in full. This action is DISMISSED without prejudice for lack of prosecution and failure to comply with court rules and orders. CASE CLOSED. (Huang, H)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
DONTA LADEAL KYLE,
11
Plaintiff,
12
13
v.
No. 2:21-CV-1376-KJM-DMC-P
ORDER
JULIE NAMAN, et al.,
14
Defendants.
15
Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action under
16
17
42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge as provided by
18
Eastern District of California local rules.
On November 17, 2021, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and recommendations,
19
20
which were served on the parties and which contained notice that the parties may file objections
21
within the time specified therein. No objections to the findings and recommendations have been
22
filed.
23
The court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United
24
States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are
25
reviewed de novo. See Robbins v. Carey, 481 F.3d 1143, 1147 (9th Cir. 2007) (“[D]eterminations
26
of law by the magistrate judge are reviewed de novo by both the district court and [the appellate]
27
court . . . .”). Having reviewed the file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be
28
supported by the record and by the proper analysis.
1
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
2
1.
The findings and recommendations filed November 17, 2021, are adopted
2.
This action is dismissed without prejudice for lack of prosecution and
3
4
5
6
7
in full;
failure to comply with court rules and orders; and
3.
The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter judgment and close this file.
DATED: January 7, 2022.
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?