(PC) Overton v. Warden C.H.C.F. et al
Filing
5
ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 1/6/2022 ADOPTING in FULL 4 Findings and Recommendations. This action is DISMISSED for Plaintiff's failure to prosecute and failure to comply with Court orders. CASE CLOSED (Reader, L)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
MICHAEL L. OVERTON,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
v.
No. 2:21-cv-01383-TLN-DB
ORDER
WARDEN, C.H.C.F., et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
17
Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief
18
under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to
19
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
20
On September 29, 2021, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein
21
which were served on Plaintiff and which contained notice to Plaintiff that any objections to the
22
findings and recommendations were to be filed within thirty days. (ECF No. 4.) Plaintiff has not
23
filed objections to the findings and recommendations.
24
The Court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be
25
supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY
26
ORDERED that:
27
28
1. The findings and recommendations filed September 29, 2021, (ECF No. 4) are adopted
in full; and
1
1
2. This action is dismissed for Plaintiff’s failure to prosecute and failure to comply with
2
Court orders. (See E.D. Cal. R. 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41)
3
DATED: January 6, 2022
4
5
6
7
Troy L. Nunley
United States District Judge
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?