(PS) Olson v. Puckett et al
Filing
120
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota on 11/18/22 VACATING the hearing set for 12/7/22 at 10:00am, DENYING 113 Motion for Clarification, GRANTING 113 Motion for Extension of Time and DIRECTING the parties to file objections to the 109 findings and recommendations within 30 days of the date of this order. (Licea Chavez, V)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
KIMBERLY OLSON,
12
13
14
15
No. 2:21-CV-1482-KJM-DMC
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER
ROBERT PUCKETT, SR., et al.,
Defendants.
16
17
Plaintiff, who is proceeding pro se, brings this civil action. Pending before the
18
Court is Plaintiff’s motion for clarification and/or an extension of time. See ECF No. 113.
19
Defendants have filed an opposition. See ECF No. 116. Plaintiff has noticed her motion for a
20
hearing before the undersigned in Redding, California, on December 7, 2022, at 10:00 a.m.
21
Pursuant to Eastern District of California Local Rule 230(g), the hearing on
22
Plaintiff’s motion will be taken off calendar because the Court finds that the matter is appropriate
23
for a decision on the record and briefs without oral argument.
24
In her motion, Plaintiff states that she seeks “clarification” of the Court’s August
25
31, 2022, findings and recommendations. See ECF No. 113. According to Plaintiff, the findings
26
and recommendations contain various errors of fact and law. See id. at 1. To the extent Plaintiff
27
believes the findings and recommendations contain errors, she may so argue in objections to the
28
findings and recommendations, not by way of the instant motion. In this regard, the docket
1
1
reflects that despite the Court having previously granted Plaintiff’s request for an extension of
2
time to file her objections, she for some reason instead elected to file the instant motion and
3
notice a hearing on the Court’s calendar. Nonetheless, the Court will grant Plaintiff’s request for
4
an additional extension of time.
5
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
6
1.
7
8
9
10
The hearing before the undersigned in Redding, California, set for
December 7, 2022, at 10:00 a.m., is vacated;
2.
Plaintiff’s motion for clarification, ECF No. 113, is denied without
prejudice to renewing her arguments in objections to the Court’s August 31, 2022, findings and
recommendations;
11
3.
Plaintiff’s motion for an extension of time, ECF No. 113, is granted;
12
4.
The parties may file objections to the Court’s August 31, 2022, findings
13
and recommendations within 30 days of the date of this order.
14
15
Dated: November 18, 2022
____________________________________
DENNIS M. COTA
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?