(PC)Garrett v. Harman et al

Filing 7

ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 1/10/2022 ADOPTING 6 Findings and Recommendations in full and DISMISSING this action without prejudice. CASE CLOSED. (Huang, H)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CAMEO L. GARRETT, 12 No. 2:21-cv-01658-TLN-EFB Plaintiff, 13 v. 14 ORDER DAWN HARMAN, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a county jail inmate proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking 17 18 relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge 19 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On November 2, 2021, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 20 21 which were served on Plaintiff and which contained notice to Plaintiff that any objections to the 22 findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. (ECF No. 6.) Plaintiff has 23 not filed objections to the findings and recommendations.1 24 /// 25 /// 26 1 27 28 Error! Main Document Only.Although it appears from the file that Plaintiff’s copy of the findings and recommendations was returned, Plaintiff was properly served. It is Plaintiff’s responsibility to keep the court apprised of his current address at all times. Pursuant to Local Rule 182(f), service of documents at the record address of the party is fully effective. 1 1 The Court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 2 supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY 3 ORDERED that: 4 5 6 7 1. The findings and recommendations filed November 2, 2021, (ECF No. 6) are adopted in full; and 2. This action is dismissed without prejudice. DATED: January 10, 2022 8 9 10 11 Troy L. Nunley United States District Judge 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?