(PC) Marti v. Manning et al
Filing
80
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 5/7/2024 GRANTING 79 Motion for Extension of Time. Defendants Opposition to 60 Motion to Compel due by 5/21/2024. (Kyono, V)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
SACRAMENTO DIVISION
11
12
ALEX LAMOTA MARTI,
13
14
v.
15
16
MANNING, et al.,
17
2:21-cv-01829-DB
Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ EX
PARTE APPLICATION FOR
EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE
OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF’S
MOTION TO COMPEL PRODUCTION
OF DOCUMENTS, SETS 3 AND 4 (ECF
NO. 60)
Defendants.
18
19
Plaintiff Alex Marti, proceeding pro se and under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, filed a Motion to
20
Compel Production of Documents, Sets 3 and 4 on March 25, 2024 (ECF No. 60). On May 6,
21
2024, Defendants A. Avalos, T. Cooper, T. Manning, S. LaRosa, D. Pasioles, J. Canela and R.
22
Roy moved ex parte for a 14-day extension from May 7 to May 21, 2024, to file an opposition to
23
Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel Production of Documents, Sets 3 and 4.
24
Defendants submitted this application because they need additional time to investigate
25
Plaintiff’s claims, obtain declarations, and draft an opposition. Defendants contend that additional
26
time is required due to the volume of discovery and discovery motions recently filed and served
27
by Plaintiff.
28
1
Order (2:21-cv-01829-DB)
1
Good cause appearing, the Court GRANTS Defendants’ Ex Parte Application for
2
Extensions of Time to File an Opposition (ECF No. 79) and extends the deadline for Defendants
3
to file an opposition to Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel Production of Documents, Sets 3 and 4
4
(ECF No. 60) to May 21, 2024. All other dates in the Scheduling Order shall remain the same.
5
6
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: May 7, 2024
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Order (2:21-cv-01829-DB)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?