(PS) Tanksley v. Baker et al
Filing
5
ORDER signed by Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 1/17/2023 ADOPTING 4 Findings and Recommendations in full. This action is DISMISSED without prejudice. CASE CLOSED. (Perdue, C.)
Case 2:21-cv-01977-KJM-DB Document 5 Filed 01/17/23 Page 1 of 2
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
MOODY WOODROW TANKSLEY,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
No. 2:21-cv-1977 KJM DB PS
v.
ORDER
CHRISTOPHER BAKER, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
Plaintiff is proceeding in this action pro se. The matter was referred to a United States
17
18
Magistrate Judge as provided by Local Rule 302(c)(21).
On October 19, 2022, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which
19
20
were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings
21
and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days after service of the findings and
22
recommendations. The time for filing objections has expired, and plaintiff has not filed any
23
objections to the findings and recommendations.
The court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States,
24
25
602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed
26
de novo. See Robbins v. Carey, 481 F.3d 1143, 1147 (9th Cir. 2007) (“[D]eterminations of law
27
by the magistrate judge are reviewed de novo by both the district court and [the appellate] court
28
/////
1
Case 2:21-cv-01977-KJM-DB Document 5 Filed 01/17/23 Page 2 of 2
1
. . . .”). Having reviewed the file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be
2
supported by the record and by the proper analysis.
3
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
4
1. The findings and recommendations filed October 19, 2022 (ECF No. 4) are adopted in
5
full;
6
2. This action is dismissed without prejudice; and
7
3. This clerk of court is directed to close this case.
8
DATED: January 17, 2023.
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?