(PS) Robinson et al v. Placer County et al
Filing
31
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Jeremy D. Peterson on 5/9/2022 DIRECTING plaintiff to SHOW CAUSE within 14 days why this action should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute, and for minor plaintiffs to obtain counsel to file an appropriate response to this order if they wish to proceed in this case. (Coll, A)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
ELLEN ROSE ROBINSON, et al.,
12
13
14
15
Plaintiffs,
v.
Case No. 2:21-cv-02037-TLN-JDP (PS)
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
RESPONSE DUE WITHIN 14 DAYS
PLACER COUNTY, et al.,
Defendants.
16
17
Three of the plaintiffs in this case, E.M.B., J.P.R, and B.M.F., are minors. Minors may
18
not proceed without counsel and failure to obtain counsel is grounds for dismissal. Johns v. Cty.
19
of San Diego, 114 F.3d 874, 877 (9th Cir. 1997). Thus, the minor plaintiffs will be dismissed if
20
counsel is not obtained.
21
22
23
Further, on February 22, 2022, the court received a notification that a mailing for the
plaintiffs had been returned as undeliverable.
Plaintiffs are required to keep the court apprised of their current addresses. Local Rule
24
183(b) provides that “[i]f mail directed to a plaintiff in propria persona by the Clerk is returned
25
by the U.S. Postal Service, and if such plaintiff fails to notify the Court and opposing parties
26
within sixty-three (63) days thereafter of a current address, the Court may dismiss the action
27
without prejudice for failure to prosecute.” Plaintiffs’ address changes were due by May 2, 2022,
28
1
1
but they failed to file, and they have not otherwise been in contact with the court. Additionally,
2
two subsequent court mailings have been returned as undeliverable.
3
Accordingly, I hereby order that:
4
1. within fourteen days from the date of entry of this order
5
a. plaintiffs show cause why this action should not be dismissed for failure to
6
prosecute, and
7
b. minor plaintiffs obtain counsel to file an appropriate response to this order if
8
they wish to proceed in this case; and
9
2. failure to comply with this order will result in dismissal of this case.
10
11
IT IS SO ORDERED.
12
Dated:
13
14
May 9, 2022
JEREMY D. PETERSON
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?