Lopez v. Bio-Reference Laboratories, Inc. et al

Filing 30

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Daniel J. Calabretta on 11/9/2023 DISMISSING this case with prejudice. CASE CLOSED. (Clemente Licea, O)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 HEATHER DAVIS, SBN 239372 heather@protectionlawgroup.com AMIR NAYEBDADASH, SBN 232204 amir@protectionlawgroup.com PRISCILLA GAMINO, SBN 315404 priscilla@protectionlawgroup.com PROTECTION LAW GROUP, LLP 237 California Street El Segundo, California 90245 Tel.: (424) 290-3095/Fax: (866) 264-7880 Attorneys for Plaintiff Denise Lopez SEYFARTH SHAW LLP Eric M. Lloyd (SBN 254390) elloyd@seyfarth.com 560 Mission Street, 31st Floor San Francisco, California 94105 Telephone: (415) 397-2823 Facsimile: (415) 397-8549 SEYFARTH SHAW LLP Michelle L. DuCharme (SBN 285572) mducharme@seyfarth.com Bradley D. Doucette (SBN 322611) bdoucette@seyfarth.com 400 Capitol Mall, Suite 2350 Sacramento, California 95814 Telephone: (916) 448-0159 Facsimile: (916) 558-4839 Attorneys for Defendants BioReference Laboratories, Inc. and OPKO Health, Inc. 19 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 20 21 22 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA DENISE LOPEZ, individually and on behalf of others similarly situated, Plaintiff, 23 24 v. 25 BIO-REFERENCE LABORATORIES, INC. a New Jersey corporation; OPKO HEALTH, INC., a Delaware Corporation; and Does 1 through 50, inclusive, 26 27 28 Case No. 2:21-cv-02063-DJC-DB Assigned to Hon. Daniel J. Calabretta JOINT STIPULATION TO DISMISS CASE; ORDER Defendants. JOINT STIPULATION TO DISMISS CASE; ORDER 1 TO THE HONORABLE COURT, ALL PARTIES, AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD: 2 It is hereby stipulated by and between the Plaintiff DENISE LOPEZ (“Plaintiff”) and 3 4 5 6 Defendants BIOREFERENCE HEALTH, LLC (formerly known as BioReference Laboratories, Inc.) and OPKO HEALTH, INC. (“Defendants”) (collectively the “Parties”), by and through their respective attorneys of record, as follows: 7 RECITALS 8 WHEREAS, on October 5, 2021, Plaintiff filed the instant Class Action Complaint in the 9 Superior Court of the State of California, County of Amador (“Class Action”). (ECF No. 1-1.) On 10 11 November 8, 2021, Defendants removed the Class Action Complaint to this Court; WHEREAS, on December 21, 2021, Plaintiff filed a separate Private Attorneys General Act 12 13 14 15 (“PAGA”) complaint in the Superior Court for the State of California, County of Los Angeles, case number 21STCV46533 (“PAGA Action”), which alleges the same wage and hour violations against the same Defendants as the instant matter; 16 WHEREAS, on December 13, 2022, the Parties participated in a private mediation session with 17 mediator Deborah Crandall Saxe and reached an agreement in principle to settle both the instant matter 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 and the PAGA Action; WHEREAS, the Parties agreed, for purposes of settlement only, to seek approval of Plaintiff’s Class Action and PAGA Action in the Los Angeles County Superior Court, and staying the instant matter during the settlement approval process; WHEREAS, on January 4, 2023, the Parties filed their Notice of Settlement and Joint Stipulation and [Proposed] Order to Stay the Action (ECF No. 22); WHEREAS, on January 11, 2023, the Court executed the Order staying this Action while the Parties sought approval of their global settlement in the Los Angeles County Superior Court and ordered the Parties to file a stipulated request for dismissal of this Action within seven (7) days after JOINT STIPULATION TO DISMISS CASE; ORDER - 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 the Los Angeles County Superior Court entered judgment (ECF No. 23); and WHEREAS, on November 2, 2023, the Los Angeles County Superior Court granted final approval of the global settlement and executed the Final Order and Judgment. NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED between the Parties, by and through their Counsel of record, as follows: 1. This case is dismissed with prejudice. IT IS SO STIPULATED. 9 10 11 DATED: November 9, 2023 12 By: /s/ Heather Davis Heather Davis Amir Nayebdadash Priscilla Gamino Attorneys for Plaintiff Denise Lopez 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 PROTECTION LAW GROUP, LLP DATED: November 9, 2023 SEYFARTH SHAW LLP By: /s/ Michelle L. DuCharme (as authorized on 11/9/23) Eric M. Lloyd Michelle L. DuCharme Bradley D. Doucette Attorneys for Defendants BioReference Laboratories, Inc. and OPKO Health, Inc. 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 JOINT STIPULATION TO DISMISS CASE; ORDER - 2 1 ORDER 2 3 4 5 6 7 Upon consideration of the foregoing Stipulation, and good cause appearing therefor, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. The case of Lopez v. BioReference Health, LLC, et al., United States District Court – Eastern District of California, Case No. 2:21-cv-02063-DJC-DB, is dismissed with prejudice; and 2. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case. 8 9 IT IS SO ORDERED. 10 11 12 Dated: November 9, 2023 /s/ Daniel J. Calabretta THE HONORABLE DANIEL J. CALABRETTA UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 JOINT STIPULATION TO DISMISS CASE; ORDER - 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?