(PS) Tanksley v. Sacramento County Police Dept. et al
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 1/10/2022 ORDERING that plaintiff shall SHOW CAUSE, in writing, within 14 days, why the failure to file an amended complaint should not result in a recommendation that this case be dismissed for failure to prosecute. The filing of an amended complaint within this timeframe will serve as cause and will discharge this order. If plaintiff fails to respond, the court will recommend dismissal of this case. (Huang, H)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
MOODY WOODROW TANKSLEY,
No. 2:21-cv-02225-KJM-AC PS
SACRAMENTO COUNTY POLICE
DEPT., et al.,
Plaintiff is proceeding in this action in pro se and in forma pauperis. On December 8,
2021, the undersigned rejected plaintiff’s complaint and provided 30 days for plaintiff to file an
amended complaint. ECF No. 3. The court cautioned plaintiff that failure to file an amended
complaint may result in dismissal of this action for failure to prosecute. Id. Plaintiff did not file
the anticipated amended complaint.
Good cause appearing, it is ORDERED that plaintiff shall show cause, in writing, within
14 days, why the failure to file an amended complaint should not result in a recommendation that
this case be dismissed for failure to prosecute. The filing of an amended complaint within this
timeframe will serve as cause and will discharge this order. If plaintiff fails to respond, the court
will recommend dismissal of this case pursuant to Local Civil Rule 110.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: January 10, 2022
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?