(PS) Tanksley v. Sacramento County Police Dept. et al

Filing 4

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 1/10/2022 ORDERING that plaintiff shall SHOW CAUSE, in writing, within 14 days, why the failure to file an amended complaint should not result in a recommendation that this case be dismissed for failure to prosecute. The filing of an amended complaint within this timeframe will serve as cause and will discharge this order. If plaintiff fails to respond, the court will recommend dismissal of this case. (Huang, H)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9
10

MOODY WOODROW TANKSLEY,

11
12
13
14
15
16

No. 2:21-cv-02225-KJM-AC PS

Plaintiff,
v.

ORDER

SACRAMENTO COUNTY POLICE
DEPT., et al.,
Defendants.
Plaintiff is proceeding in this action in pro se and in forma pauperis. On December 8,

17

2021, the undersigned rejected plaintiff’s complaint and provided 30 days for plaintiff to file an

18

amended complaint. ECF No. 3. The court cautioned plaintiff that failure to file an amended

19

complaint may result in dismissal of this action for failure to prosecute. Id. Plaintiff did not file

20

the anticipated amended complaint.

21

Good cause appearing, it is ORDERED that plaintiff shall show cause, in writing, within

22

14 days, why the failure to file an amended complaint should not result in a recommendation that

23

this case be dismissed for failure to prosecute. The filing of an amended complaint within this

24

timeframe will serve as cause and will discharge this order. If plaintiff fails to respond, the court

25

will recommend dismissal of this case pursuant to Local Civil Rule 110.

26
27
28

IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: January 10, 2022