(PC) Ramos v. California Dept of Corrections et al
Filing
20
ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 9/6/2023 ADOPTING in FULL 19 Findings and Recommendations. This action is DISMISSED without prejudice, and the Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case. CASE CLOSED (Reader, L)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
JOSE RAMOS,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
15
No. 2:22-cv-0004-TLN-DB
v.
ORDER
CALIFORNIA DEPT OF
CORRECTIONS, et al.,
Defendants.
16
17
Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights action seeking relief
18
19
under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to
20
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
On July 28, 2023, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which
21
22
were served on Plaintiff, and which contained notice to Plaintiff that any objections to the
23
findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff did not file
24
objections to the findings and recommendations.
The Court reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported
25
26
by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis.
27
///
28
///
1
1
2
3
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. The findings and recommendations filed July 28, 2023 (ECF No. 19) are ADOPTED IN
FULL;
4
2. This action is DISMISSED without prejudice; and
5
3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case.
6
Date: September 6, 2023
7
8
9
10
Troy L. Nunley
United States District Judge
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?