(PC) Ramos v. California Dept of Corrections et al

Filing 20

ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 9/6/2023 ADOPTING in FULL 19 Findings and Recommendations. This action is DISMISSED without prejudice, and the Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case. CASE CLOSED (Reader, L)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JOSE RAMOS, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 15 No. 2:22-cv-0004-TLN-DB v. ORDER CALIFORNIA DEPT OF CORRECTIONS, et al., Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights action seeking relief 18 19 under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 20 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On July 28, 2023, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which 21 22 were served on Plaintiff, and which contained notice to Plaintiff that any objections to the 23 findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff did not file 24 objections to the findings and recommendations. The Court reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported 25 26 by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. 27 /// 28 /// 1 1 2 3 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The findings and recommendations filed July 28, 2023 (ECF No. 19) are ADOPTED IN FULL; 4 2. This action is DISMISSED without prejudice; and 5 3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case. 6 Date: September 6, 2023 7 8 9 10 Troy L. Nunley United States District Judge 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?