Hogan et al v. Central Loan Administration and Reporting et al
Filing
4
ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 1/11/2022 GRANTING #3 Ex Parte Motion for Extension of Time to respond by 1/26/2022. (Kirksey Smith, K)
1 BRYAN CAVE LEIGHTON PAISNER LLP
Helen C. Looney, California Bar No. 324725
2 Three Embarcadero Center, 7th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111-4070
(415) 675-3400
Facsimile:
(415) 675-3434
E-Mail: helen.looney@bclplaw.com
3 Telephone:
4
5 Attorneys for Defendant
CITIBANK, N.A.
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
BRYAN CAVE LLP
THREE EMBARCADERO CENTER, 7TH FLOOR
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111-4070
8
(SACRAMENTO COURTHOUSE)
11 THOMAS M. HOGAN and RU HOGAN,
Plaintiffs,
12
15
[Placer County Superior Court Case No. SCV-0047363]
v.
13
14
Case No.: 2:22-cv-00039-WBS-AC
CENTRAL LOAN ADMINISTRATION dba
CENLAR FSB; CITIBANK; CITIBANK NA;
CITIGROUP.; and DOES 1 through 20
inclusive,
16
ORDER GRANTING EX PARTE
MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME
FOR DEFENDANT CITIBANK, N.A. TO
RESPOND TO COMPLAINT
Defendants.
17
Complaint Filed:
Removed:
Trial Date:
18
September 27, 2021
January 5, 2022
Not Assigned
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
USA.604683957.1/HCZ
ORDER GRANTING EX PARTE MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR CITIBANK TO RESPOND TO
COMPLAINT
CASE NO.: 2:22-CV-00039-WBS-AC
1
The Ex Parte Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiffs’
2 Complaint filed by Defendant Citibank, N.A. (“Citibank”) was submitted to the
3 Court on January 11, 2022.
4
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:
5
1.
hereby GRANTED;
6
7
Citibank’s Ex Parte Motion for Extension of Time to Respond is
2.
Citibank shall file its responsive pleading by January 26, 2022.
8
9
Dated: January 11, 2022
BRYAN CAVE LLP
THREE EMBARCADERO CENTER, 7TH FLOOR
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111-4070
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
USA.604683957.1/HCZ
1
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING EX PARTE MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR CITIBANK TO
RESPOND TO COMPLAINT
CASE NO.: 2:22-CV-00039-WBS-AC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?