(PC) Jaramillo v. Tappan et al
Filing
66
ORDER signed by Senior District Judge William B. Shubb on 06/04/2024 ADOPTING 63 Findings and Recommendations in Full and DENYING 53 Motion for Summary Judgment. Plaintiff shall proceed on his Eighth Amendment claim. (Murphy, J)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
RUDIE ANTHONY JARAMILLO,
12
13
14
15
No. 2:22-cv-00075-WBS-EFB (PC)
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER
T. TAPPAN, et al.,
Defendants.
16
17
Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief
18
under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to
19
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
20
On February 12, 2024, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and recommendations herein
21
which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to
22
the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. (Docket No. 63.) The
23
Magistrate Judge recommended that plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment be denied.
24
Although neither party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations, the court
25
notes that defendant filed a letter on May 16, 2024 asking for the status of his case. (Docket No.
26
65.) The court also notes that plaintiff has filed change of address notices three times since filing
27
the motion for summary judgment. (Docket Nos. 55, 62, 64.) The first notice, indicating he was
28
moved to California State Prison - Mule Creek, was filed April 6, 2023. The second notice,
1
1
indicating he was moved to California State Prison - Pleasant Valley, was filed January 16, 2024,
2
almost a month before the issuance of the findings and recommendations. The third notice,
3
indicating he was moved to back to CSP - Mule Creek, was filed April 4, 2024, almost two
4
months after the issuance of the findings and recommendations. The docket also reflects that the
5
court’s findings and recommendations were mailed to plaintiff’s address at CSP Pleasant Valley
6
on February 12, 2024. Thus, notwithstanding the ambiguity of plaintiff’s May 16, 2024 letter and
7
plaintiff’s multiple transfers, it appears that the findings and recommendations were received by
8
plaintiff with sufficient time to file any objections.
9
The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be
10
supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY
11
ORDERED that:
12
13
1. The findings and recommendations filed February 12, 2024 (Docket No. 63), are
adopted in full;
14
2. Plaintiff’s March 28, 2023 motion for summary judgment (Docket No. 53) is DENIED.
15
3. Plaintiff shall proceed on his Eighth Amendment claim for excessive force against
16
defendant Tappan.
17
Dated: June 4, 2024
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?