(PC) McNutt v. Unknown

Filing 13

ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 8/2/2022 ORDERING that the Clerk shall assign a district judge to this action, and RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed without prejudice. Chief District J udge Kimberly J. Mueller and Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman assigned for all further proceedings. Referred to Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller. Objections due within 14 days after being served with these findings and recommendations. New Case Number: 2:22-cv-0121-KJM-KJN (PC). (Huang, H)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

BRIAN KEITH MCNUTT,

12

Plaintiff,

13

v.

14

WARDEN, CSP-FOLSOM, et al.,

15

No. 2:22-cv-0121 KJN P

ORDER and FINDINGS &
RECOMMENDATIONS

Defendants.

16
By order filed March 22, 2022, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed and thirty days leave

17
18

to file an amended complaint was granted. On April 22, 2022, plaintiff was granted an additional

19

ninety days in which to file an amended complaint. Ninety days from that date have now expired,

20

and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the court’s order. 1

21

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk shall assign a district judge to

22

this action.
IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See

23
24

Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

25

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge

26

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days

27
28

1

The CDCR inmate locator reflects that plaintiff is no longer in state custody.
1

1

after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections

2

with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings

3

and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified

4

time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153

5

(9th Cir. 1991).

6

Dated: August 2, 2022

7
8
9

/mcnu0121.fta.ext

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2