(PS)Clark v. Allison et al
Filing
20
ORDER signed by Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 03/27/24 ADOPTING 17 Findings and Recommendations in full, GRANTING 13 Motion to Dismiss, and DISMISSING Plaintiff's Fourteenth Amendment due process and state law negligence claims, without leave to amend. This action proceed on plaintiff's Eighth Amendment failure to protect claim. This action is REFERRED back to the assigned magistrate for all further pretrial proceedings. (Licea Chavez, V)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
Michael Clark,
12
13
14
15
Case No. 2:22-cv-00190-KJM-JDP (PS)
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER
Kathleen Allison, et al.,
Defendants.
16
17
On February 14, 2024, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which
18
were served on the parties, and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and
19
recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff filed objections on February 22,
20
2024, and they were considered by the undersigned.
21
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this
22
court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having reviewed the file, the court finds the
23
findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the proper analysis.
24
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
25
1. The Findings and Recommendations filed February 14, 2024, are adopted;
26
2. Defendants’ motion to dismiss, ECF No. 13, is granted;
27
3. Plaintiff’s Fourteenth Amendment due process and state law negligence claims are
28
dismissed without leave to amend;
1
1
4. This action proceed on plaintiff’s Eighth Amendment failure to protect claim; and
2
5. This action is referred back to the assigned magistrate for all further pretrial
3
proceedings.
4
DATED: March 27, 2024.
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?