(PC) Vicari v. Amador County, California

Filing 25

ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 02/02/2024 ADOPTING 24 Findings and Recommendations in full and DISMISSING this action without prejudice. CASE CLOSED.(Lopez, K)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DONALD ANGELO VICARI, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. 2:22-cv-0215-TLN-AC v. ORDER AMADOR COUNTY, 15 Defendant. 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights action seeking relief 17 18 under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 19 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On January 10, 2024, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 20 21 which were served on all parties, and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to 22 the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. (ECF No. 24.) The 23 time to file objections has passed, and neither party filed objections to the findings and 24 recommendations. The Court reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported 25 26 by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. 27 /// 28 /// 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The findings and recommendations filed January 10, 2024 (ECF No. 24) are ADOPTED IN FULL; 2. This action is DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b); and 3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case. Date: February 2, 2024 8 9 10 11 Troy L. Nunley United States District Judge 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?