(PC) Vicari v. Amador County, California
Filing
25
ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 02/02/2024 ADOPTING 24 Findings and Recommendations in full and DISMISSING this action without prejudice. CASE CLOSED.(Lopez, K)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
DONALD ANGELO VICARI,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
No. 2:22-cv-0215-TLN-AC
v.
ORDER
AMADOR COUNTY,
15
Defendant.
16
Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights action seeking relief
17
18
under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to
19
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
On January 10, 2024, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein
20
21
which were served on all parties, and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to
22
the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. (ECF No. 24.) The
23
time to file objections has passed, and neither party filed objections to the findings and
24
recommendations.
The Court reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported
25
26
by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis.
27
///
28
///
1
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. The findings and recommendations filed January 10, 2024 (ECF No. 24) are
ADOPTED IN FULL;
2. This action is DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil
Procedure 41(b); and
3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case.
Date: February 2, 2024
8
9
10
11
Troy L. Nunley
United States District Judge
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?