Dunn v. Austin et al

Filing 37

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 5/9/22 APPROVING the stipulation. Proceedings in this Court are STAYED pending Plaintiff's appeal from the order denying Plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction. Within seven days of the issuance of the mandate, the parties shall confer and propose a briefing schedule related to Defendants' 31 motion to dismiss or, in the alternative, for summary judgment. (Kastilahn, A)

1 BRIAN M. BOYNTON
Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General
2 PHILLIP A. TALBERT
3 United States Attorney
ALEXANDER K. HAAS
4 Director, Federal Programs Branch
ANTHONY J. COPPOLINO
5 Deputy Director, Federal Programs Branch
STUART J. ROBINSON
6 Senior Counsel (CA Bar No. 267183)
7 COURTNEY D. ENLOW
Trial Attorney (NC Bar No. 46578)
8 United States Department of Justice
Civil Division, Federal Programs Branch
9 1100 L Street, NW
Washington, DC 20005
10
Telephone: [phone]
11 Fax: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
12
Counsel for Defendants
13
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
14
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SACRAMENTO DIVISION
15
16 JONATHAN DUNN,
17
18

Plaintiff,
v.

19

LLOYD AUSTIN, in his official capacity as
20 Secretary of Defense, et al.
21
22

Defendants.

)
)
)
)
) Case No. 2:22-cv-288-JAM-KJN
)
) STIPULATION CONCERNING STAY OF
) PROCEEDINGS PENDING APPEAL
)
)
)
)

23
24

On February 22, 2022, the Court denied Plaintiff’s motion for a preliminary injunction.

25 See ECF No. 16. On February 24, 2022, Plaintiff appealed from the Court’s order denying his
26 motion to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. ECF No. 19. On May 6, 2022, the
27 Court’s chambers inquired whether the parties would oppose a stay of district court proceedings
28 pending appeal of the Court’s order denying Plaintiff’s motion. Defendants and Plaintiff,
STIPULATION CONCERNING STAY OF PROCEEDINGS PENDING APPEAL
DUNN V. AUSTIN, CASE NO. 2:22-CV-00288-JAM-KJN

1

1 through counsel, hereby stipulate that they do not oppose a stay of district court proceedings
2 pending appeal.
3
4 IT IS SO STIPULATED.
5
6
7

Dated: May 9, 2022

Respectfully submitted,
BRIAN M. BOYNTON
Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General

8
9
10
11
12
13
14

PHILLIP A. TALBERT
United States Attorney
ALEXANDER K. HAAS
Director, Federal Programs Branch
ANTHONY J. COPPOLINO
Deputy Director, Federal Programs Branch

21

/s/ Stuart J. Robinson
STUART J. ROBINSON
Senior Counsel (CA Bar No. 267183)
COURTNEY D. ENLOW
Trial Attorney (NC Bar No. 46578)
United States Department of Justice
Civil Division, Federal Programs Branch
1100 L Street, NW
Washington, DC 20005
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]

22

Counsel for Defendants

23

/s/ Thomas Molloy________
Thomas Molloy, SBN 325068
1125 Wedgewood Drive,
Woodway, TX 76712
[phone]
Counsel for Plaintiff

15
16
17
18
19
20

24
25
26
27
28

STIPULATION CONCERNING STAY OF PROCEEDINGS PENDING APPEAL
DUNN V. AUSTIN, CASE NO. 2:22-CV-00288-JAM-KJN

2

ORDER

1
2

The stipulation is approved. Proceedings in this Court are stayed pending Plaintiff’s appeal

3 from the order denying Plaintiff’s motion for a preliminary injunction. Within seven days of the
4 issuance of the mandate, the parties shall confer and propose a briefing schedule related to
5

Defendants’ motion to dismiss or, in the alternative, for summary judgment, ECF No. 31.

6
7
8
9

Dated: May 9, 2022

/s/ John A. Mendez
THE HONORABLE JOHN A. MENDEZ
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION CONCERNING STAY OF PROCEEDINGS PENDING APPEAL
DUNN V. AUSTIN, CASE NO. 2:22-CV-00288-JAM-KJN

3