(PC) Springfield v. Hudson et al

Filing 61

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 08/29/2024 GRANTING 60 Motion for Extension of Time. Plaintiff is GRANTED 45 days from the date of this Order in which to file an opposition to 58 Motion for Summary Judgment. (Lopez, K)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CIRON SPRINGFIELD, 12 No. 2:22-cv-0328 DAD CKD P Plaintiff, 13 v. 14 HUDSON, et al., 15 ORDER Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff filed a motion for extension of time to file an opposition to defendant’s motion 18 for summary judgment filed on August 2, 2024. Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY 19 ORDERED that: 20 1. Plaintiff’s motion for an extension of time (ECF No. 60) is granted; and 21 2. Plaintiff is granted forty-five days from the date of this order in which to file an 22 opposition to defendant’s motion for summary judgment. Failure to file an opposition within 23 forty-five days will result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. 24 Dated: August 29, 2024 _____________________________________ CAROLYN K. DELANEY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 25 26 27 28 1/kly spri0328.36 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?