(PC) Hill v. Hlaing

Filing 23

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota on 02/27/23 GRANTING 22 Motion for Extension of Time. Defendant may file a responsive pleading or motion addressing Plaintiff's in forma pauperis status on or before 04/07/23.(Licea Chavez, V)

Download PDF
Case 2:22-cv-00357-DAD-DMC Document 23 Filed 02/27/23 Page 1 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ROB BONTA, State Bar No. 202668 Attorney General of California JANET N. CHEN, State Bar No. 283233 Supervising Deputy Attorney General SOPHIA A. LECKY, State Bar No. 343039 Deputy Attorney General 300 South Spring Street, Suite 1702 Los Angeles, CA 90013-1230 Telephone: (213) 269-6513 Fax: (916) 761-3641 E-mail: Sophia.Lecky@doj.ca.gov Attorneys for Defendant Min Min Hlaing, M.D. 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SACRAMENTO DIVISION 11 12 13 CYMEYON HILL, Plaintiff, ORDER 14 v. 15 16 Case No. 2:22-cv-00357-DAD-DMC (PC) MIN HLAING, 17 Defendant. 18 19 20 Good cause appearing based on counsel’s declaration indicating the need for additional 21 22 time to review Plaintiff’s litigation history and in forma pauperis declaration, Defendant’s request 23 for an extension of time is GRANTED. 1. 24 Defendant may file a responsive pleading or motion addressing Plaintiff’s in forma pauperis status on or before April 7, 2023; and 25 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// 1 [Proposed] Order (2:22-cv-00357-DAD-DMC (PC)) Case 2:22-cv-00357-DAD-DMC Document 23 Filed 02/27/23 Page 2 of 2 1 2 2. Defendant shall file his responsive pleading within twenty-one days of the final disposition of any motion regarding Plaintiff’s IFP status, if necessary. 3 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. 5 Dated: February 27, 2023 ____________________________________ DENNIS M. COTA UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 [Proposed] Order (2:22-cv-00357-DAD-DMC (PC))

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?