(PC) Springfield v. CDCR et al

Filing 14

ORDER signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 5/17/2023 ADOPTING 13 Findings and Recommendations in full. This action is DISMISSED, without prejudice, due to plaintiff's failure to prosecute this action and failure to comply with the court's orders. CASE CLOSED. (Perdue, C.)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

CIRON B. SPRINGFIELD,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14
15

v.

No. 2:22-cv-00444-DAD-DMC (PC)

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS AND DISMISSING
THIS ACTION

CDCR, et al.,
Defendants.

(Doc. No. 13)

16
17

Plaintiff Ciron B. Springfield is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights

18

action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This matter was referred to a United States

19

Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

20

On September 6, 2022, court denied plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis and

21

ordered plaintiff to pay the required $402.00 filing fee in order to proceed with this action. (Doc.

22

No. 7.) Plaintiff was warned in the order that his failure to pay the filing fee in full would result

23

in the dismissal of this action without prejudice. (Id. at 2.) Despite receiving a 30-day extension

24

of time in which to comply with the court’s order (see Doc. No. 12), to date, plaintiff has not paid

25

the required filing fee or otherwise communicated with the court.

26

Accordingly, on February 15, 2023, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and

27

recommendations recommending that this action be dismissed, without prejudice, due to

28

plaintiff’s failure to prosecute this action and failure to comply with court orders. (Doc. No. 13.)
1

1

The pending findings and recommendations were served on plaintiff and contained notice that

2

any objections thereto were to be filed within fourteen (14) days after service. (Id. at 2.) To date,

3

no objections to the findings and recommendations have been filed, and the time in which to do

4

so has now passed.

5

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), this court has conducted a

6

de novo review of the case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court concludes that the

7

findings and recommendations are supported by the record and by proper analysis.

8

Accordingly:

9

1.

10

The findings and recommendations issued on February 15, 2023 (Doc. No. 13) are
adopted in full;

11

2.

This action is dismissed, without prejudice, due to plaintiff’s failure to prosecute
this action and failure to comply with the court’s orders; and

12
13

3.

14

IT IS SO ORDERED.

15

Dated:

The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case.

May 17, 2023
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2