(PC) Williams v. Jalijali et al

Filing 24

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Jeremy D. Peterson on 09/16/2022 GRANTING 22 Motion for Extension of Time. Defendants shall file a responsive pleading no later than 30 days after the Court renders a decision on their motion to revoke Plaintiff's in forma pauperis (IFP) status. (Spichka, K.)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 LANCE WILLIAMS, 13 14 v. 15 16 Case No. 2:22-cv-00605-JDP Plaintiff, [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT JALIJALI AND DEFENDANT LACROIX’S REQUEST FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE A RESPONSIVE PLEADING JEHOSHUA JALIJALI, et al., 17 Defendants. 18 Plaintiff is a former state prisoner proceeding pro se. Defendant Jalijali and Defendant 19 20 Lacroix filed a request for extension of time to file a responsive pleading. 21 Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 22 1. Defendants’ motion for an extension of time to file a responsive pleading is 23 GRANTED; and 24 /// 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// 1 2. Defendants shall file a responsive pleading no later than thirty days after the Court 2 renders a decision on their motion to revoke Plaintiff’s in forma pauperis (IFP) status, or, if 3 granted, thirty days after Defendants receive notice that Plaintiff paid the filing fee or has 4 otherwise been granted leave to continue proceeding IFP. 5 6 IT IS SO ORDERED. 7 Dated: 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 September 16, 2022 JEREMY D. PETERSON UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?