(PC) Puckett v. Moreno et al
Filing
61
ORDER signed by Senior District Judge William B. Shubb on 08/29/2024 ADOPTING 60 Findings and Recommendations in Full and DISMISSING all claims without prejudice against Defendant Hayes, with exception of Plaintiff's Eight Amendment claim for failure to protect. (Murphy, J)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
DURRELL ANTHONY PUCKETT,
12
13
14
Case No. 2:22-cv-00650-WBS-JDP (PC)
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER
D. MORENO, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
17
Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief
18
under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to
19
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
20
On July 18, 2024, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which
21
were served on all parties, and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the
22
findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. No party has filed
23
objections to the findings and recommendations.
24
The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be
25
supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY
26
ORDERED that:
27
1. The findings and recommendations filed July 18, 2024, are adopted in full and
28
2. All claims are dismissed without prejudice as against defendant Hayes with the
1
1
exception of plaintiff’s Eight Amendment claim for failure to protect.
2
Dated: August 29, 2024
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?