(PC) Howell v. Moktar et al

Filing 37

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 11/14/2023 GRANTING-IN-PART and DENYING-IN-PART Plaintiff's 33 Notice of Additional Information to Serve Defendant and Motion for Court Order and STRIKING the 34 Request for Court Order for CDCR to Forward Defendant's last known address. Within 30 days, counsel of record for defendants Childs, Johnson, Williamson, and Troja shall obtain from the CDCR the last known address it has on file for defendant J. Mokhtar and produce the address to the court via email. (Spichka, K.)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

KAREEM J. HOWELL,

12

No. 2:22-cv-00842 DB P

Plaintiff,

13

v.

14

ORDER

J. MOKTAR, et al.,

15

Defendants.

16
Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with this civil rights

17
18

action seeking relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff alleges that defendants used

19

excessive force against him and retaliated against him in violation of the First and Eighth

20

Amendments. Presently before the court is plaintiff’s requests that the court direct the California

21

Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (“CDCR”) and the California Attorney General’s

22

Office to help serve defendant Mokhtar.1 (ECF Nos. 33, 34.) For the reasons stated below, the

23

court will grant in part and deny in part the first request (ECF No. 33) and will strike the second

24

request (ECF No. 34).

25

////

26
This defendant’s last name appears as “Moktar” on the docket, while the California Attorney
General’s Office has spelled it “Mokhtar.” (See ECF No. 22.) Plaintiff uses various spellings of
the name in his filings. (See ECF No. 33.) The court will use the spelling provided by the
California Attorney General’s Office.
1
1

27
28

1

I.

2

Background
On June 11, 2023, the court issued an order directing service on defendants Mokhtar,

3

Troja, Johnson, Childs, and Williamson. (ECF No. 15.) Because plaintiff identified these

4

defendants as CDCR employees at the time of the alleged violations, their information was

5

provided electronically to CDCR and the California Attorney General’s Office to effectuate

6

service, pursuant to the court’s E-Service pilot program for civil rights cases. (Id. at 2.) The

7

summons was returned unexecuted as to defendant Mokhtar because he no longer works for

8

CDCR. (ECF No. 24.)

9

On August 7, 2023, the court directed plaintiff to submit service documents to the U.S.

10

Marshal’s Service providing additional information to serve defendant Mokhtar. (ECF No. 25.)

11

The court’s order stated: “Plaintiff shall promptly seek such information through discovery, the

12

California Public Records Act, Calif. Gov’t. Code § 6250, et seq., or other means available to

13

plaintiff. If access to the required information is denied or unreasonably delayed, plaintiff may

14

seek judicial intervention.” (Id. at 1.)

15

The court received the required documents from plaintiff on September 26, 2023. (ECF

16

No. 32.) The U.S. Marshal’s Service attempted service on the address provided by plaintiff but

17

was informed that defendant Mokhtar did not live at the address. (ECF No. 35.) The summons

18

was returned unexecuted on September 27, 2023. (Id.)

19
20

Plaintiff’s requests

II.

Plaintiff included with the required documents a filing entitled “Additional Information

21

To Have This Defendant Served.” (ECF No. 33.) In it, plaintiff explains that he had previously

22

sued defendant Mokhtar in a separate action before this court, Howell v. Johnson, 2:20-cv-0520

23

(E.D. Cal.), and that defendant Mokhtar had been represented by the California Attorney

24

General’s Office in that action. (Id. at 1–2.) Plaintiff asks “that this court order

25

CDCR/defendants herein counsel to either continue representing defendant J. Mokhtor as well,

26

and see to it that service is complete” or to “assist the plaintiff herein, and this court in locating

27

defendant J. Mokhtor by providing defendant J. Mokhtor last known address given to CDCR.”

28

(Id. at 2.)
2

On October 13, 2023, the court received a document from plaintiff entitled “Plaintiff

1
2

Request to the Court, Ordering (CDCR) To Forward To the Court Defendant J. Mokhtar Last

3

Known Address.” (ECF No. 34.) Plaintiff did not sign or date the filing.

4

III.

Analysis
The court will grant in part and deny in part plaintiff’s first request. (ECF No. 33.)

5
6

“‘[A]n incarcerated pro se plaintiff proceeding in forma pauperis is entitled to rely on the U.S.

7

Marshal for service of the summons and complaint . . .’”. Jensen v. Knowles, 621 F. Supp. 2d

8

921, 930 (E.D. Cal. 2008) (quoting Puett v. Blandford, 912 F.2d 270, 275 (9th Cir. 1990))

9

(alteration in original); see also Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(c)(3). The plaintiff must “act with diligence and

10

provide the Marshal with sufficient information to serve the defendant.” Id. In this case, plaintiff

11

has identified defendant Mokhtar’s last known attorney and CDCR as potential sources for this

12

information, based on a previous lawsuit plaintiff brought against defendant Mokhtar that was

13

dismissed in July 2022. (ECF No. 53, Howell v. Johnson, 2:22-cv-0520 (E.D. Cal.).) The

14

California Attorney General’s Office represented defendant Mokhtar in that action and represents

15

defendants Childs, Johnson, Williamson, and Troja in the instant action. (See ECF No. 33 at 3,

16

5–9; ECF No. 26.)

17

Accordingly, the court will order counsel for defendants Childs, Johnson, Williamson, and

18

Troja to obtain defendant Mokhtar’s last known address from CDCR and provide the address to

19

the court.

20

The court will order plaintiff’s second request (ECF No. 34) to be stricken because

21

plaintiff did not sign it. The court cannot consider unsigned filings. Fed. R. Civ. P. 11; E.D. Cal.

22

R. 131.

23

CONCLUSION

24

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

25

1. Plaintiff’s notice of additional information to serve defendant J. Mokhtar and motion

26
27
28

for the court (ECF No. 33) is granted in part and denied in part.
2. Within thirty days of the date of this order, counsel of record for defendants Childs,
Johnson, Williamson, and Troja shall:
3

1

a.

2

the last known address it has on file for defendant J. Mokhtar, and

3

b.

4
5
6
7

Obtain from the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation

Produce the address to the court by emailing it to:
[e-mail].

3.

Plaintiff’s request for a court order for CDCR to forward defendant’s last known
address (ECF No. 34) is stricken because it is unsigned.

Dated: November 14, 2023

8
9
10

DB: 15
DB/DB Prisoner Inbox/Civil Rights/R/howe0842.8e(2)

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4