(PC) Hicks v. Covello et al
Filing
20
ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 02/02/2024 ADOPTING 19 Findings and Recommendations in full. This action shall proceed solely as to Plaintiff's Eighth Amendment claims against Defendants Powell and Dr. Pleshchuk. Plaintiff's remaining claims and Defendants Dr. Kim and Costa are DISMISSED without prejudice. This matter is referred back to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings.(Lopez, K)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
DARYL HICKS,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
No. 2:22-cv-0903-TLN-KJN
v.
ORDER
PATRICK COVELLO, et al,
15
Defendants.
16
Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights action seeking relief
17
18
under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to
19
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
20
On December 21, 2023, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein
21
which were served on Plaintiff, and which contained notice to Plaintiff that any objections to the
22
findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. The time to file objections
23
has passed, and Plaintiff did not file any objections.
The Court reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported
24
25
by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis.
26
///
27
///
28
///
1
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. The findings and recommendations filed December 21, 2023 (ECF No. 19) are
ADOPTED IN FULL;
2. This action shall proceed solely as to Plaintiff’s Eighth Amendment claims against
Defendants Powell and Dr. Pleshchuk;
3. Plaintiff’s remaining claims and Defendants Dr. Kim and Costa are DISMISSED
without prejudice; and
4. This matter is referred back to the magistrate judge for further proceedings.
Date: February 2, 2024
10
11
12
13
Troy L. Nunley
United States District Judge
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?